RFC: Transitioning from binary blocking to x402 negotiation #1
arun-fairfetch
started this conversation in
Show and tell
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The Problem:
robots.txtis a static "keep out" sign. In an agentic web, we need a dynamic handshake.The Proposal: Fairfetch uses the HTTP 402 code as a bridge. This discussion is for anyone who wants to debate the protocol flow. Our current implementation uses:
Content Lineage: Verified via
core/signatures.pyusing the Ed25519 signer andSignatureBundle.The Handshake: Enforced by
payments/x402.py, which gates/content/*routes and manages the 402 "Payment Required" challenge.Bot Steering: Handled in
api/negotiation.py, which detects scrapers vs. AI agents to trigger the protocol.Check the code: I’m looking for feedback on the middleware logic in
payments/x402.py. Is the x402 flow robust enough for production agents?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions