IPv6 support

[chrisvanmeer]

Will you be implementing IPv6 support on all current GET/ADD/SET/REMOVE methods?

[alagoutte]

the IPv6 support is not really the first priority

What cmdlet need IPv6 support ? only Address ?

[chrisvanmeer]

Address
Address groups
VIPs
Policies
Static routes

[alagoutte]

Ok for Address and Static Routes

Address Groups and Policies use Address

and for VIP, there is no need NAT with IPv6 ;-)

[chrisvanmeer]

From security point, NAT6 can be very useful.

[alagoutte]

From security point, NAT6 can be very useful.

I'm some doubt about NAT and security...

[poundy]

I'd agree that IPv6 doesn't seem to be a priority for many of us in the world, but sometime it will need to be..... and while I don't use it I would suggest that it should be in the roadmap. Not trying to influence the priority of it, but I'd add it on the work list.

[alagoutte]

I'd agree that IPv6 doesn't seem to be a priority for many of us in the world, but sometime it will need to be..... and while I don't use it I would suggest that it should be in the roadmap. Not trying to influence the priority of it, but I'd add it on the work list.

it is on the roadmap but there is some major needed feature before... (Interface, Security Profiles, VPN and Tests !...)

but if someone send me patch for add IPv6 support, no problem :-)