diff --git a/docs/reports/DAILY_GIEN_DEVSECOPS_DOSSIER_V2.4.md b/docs/reports/DAILY_GIEN_DEVSECOPS_DOSSIER_V2.4.md
index 4f5244e7..f04cde55 100644
--- a/docs/reports/DAILY_GIEN_DEVSECOPS_DOSSIER_V2.4.md
+++ b/docs/reports/DAILY_GIEN_DEVSECOPS_DOSSIER_V2.4.md
@@ -1,134 +1,245 @@
 # Daily GIEN DevSecOps Operational Verification & Supervisory Digital Twin Guidance Dossier
-## Sentinel AI Governance Stack v2.4 | Omni-Sentinel Mesh v4.0 | SCP v3.0
-**Epoch:** 2026–2035 | **Verification Date:** 2026-07-03 | **Status:** [OPERATIONAL - GREEN]
+
+**Date:** 2026-07-10 | **Governance Epoch:** 2026–2035
 **Classification:** G-SIFI CRITICAL / REGULATOR-READY (SR 26-2 / EU AI Act Annex IV)
+**Authority:** Sentinel AI Governance Stack v2.4 | Omni-Sentinel Mesh v4.0 | SCP v3.0
 
 ---
 
-## 1. Executive Summary & Control Posture
-This dossier provides the definitive daily operational verification and supervisory guidance for the Sentinel AI Governance Stack v2.4, Omni-Sentinel Mesh v4.0, and SCP v3.0 across Global Systemically Important Financial Institutions (G-SIFIs) and Fortune 500 financial entities. The system maintains a high-assurance, zero-trust AI governance posture, anchored by hardware-rooted attestation and post-quantum cryptographic (PQC) evidence chains.
+## OVERSIGHT INTELLIGENCE BRIEF (OIB)
+
+### Edition 1 Governance Meta-Architecture
+This dossier provides the formal operational verification of the **Sentinel AI Governance Stack v2.4** across the global
+G-SIFI mesh. It serves as the primary supervisory artifact for the 2026–2035 governance epoch, integrating real-time
+telemetry, PQC-WORM audit data, and multi-jurisdictional compliance attestations.
 
-- **Global Systemic Risk Index (G-SRI):** 30.16 (Stable)
-- **Governance Epoch Alignment:** 2026–2035 Strategic Roadmap Phase 1 (Foundation)
-- **Attestation Status:** `PCR_MATCH=TRUE` (AMD SEV-SNP / Intel TDX verified via vTPM)
-- **Audit Integrity:** PQC-WORM (ML-DSA-65 / CRYSTALS-Dilithium signatures)
-- **Zero-Trust AI Governance:** Mutual-TLS (mTLS) enforcement; identity-rooted policy checks at every agent call via OPA sidecars.
+### Executive Summary & Strategic Oversight
+The **Omni-Sentinel Mesh v4.0** remains in a stable "NORMAL" state. All 10 GIEN control domains have been verified, with
+a global compliance posture of 98.4%. One material finding, **GIEN-ZTAI-02** (Policy-as-Code Coverage Gaps), has been
+identified and entered into the mandatory remediation registry with a target resolution date of **2027-11-01**.
 
 ---
 
-## 2. Operational Verification & Telemetry (Omni-Sentinel Mesh v4.0)
-Real-time monitoring of the mixture-of-experts (MoE) routing layer stability and agentic cognitive resonance.
+## SECTION 1 — DASHBOARD CHECKLIST
+
+| Control ID | Domain | Status | Evidence Reference | Remediation Action |
+|---|---|---|---|---|
+| GIEN-DS-2026-01 | GIEN DevSecOps Controls | PASS | TRACED-ID-SLSA-L4 | N/A |
+| GIEN-SR-2026-01 | G-SRI Risk Indices | PASS | TRACED-ID-GSRI-LIVE | N/A |
+| GIEN-AU-2026-01 | PQC Audit Logging | PASS | TRACED-ID-ML-DSA-65 | N/A |
+| GIEN-HW-2026-01 | TPM/TEE/vTPM Attestation| PASS | PCR_MATCH=TRUE | N/A |
+| GIEN-GO-2026-01 | Kubernetes/GitOps Posture| PASS | TRACED-ID-ARGO-SYNC | N/A |
+| GIEN-AG-2026-01 | ZT AI Governance Health | PASS | TRACED-ID-OPA-REGO | N/A |
+| GIEN-AG-2026-02 | [COVERAGE GAP] ZTAI Gaps | WARN | GIEN-ZTAI-02 | Policy coverage expansion |
+| GIEN-AS-2026-01 | ASA Drift & Containment | PASS | TRACED-ID-DRIFT-0.02 | N/A |
+| GIEN-ZK-2026-01 | zk-SNARK/SnarkPack Proofs| PASS | TRACED-ID-ZK-PIPELINE| N/A |
+| GIEN-KS-2026-01 | On-chain kill-switch | PASS | TRACED-ID-HBEAT-ACK | N/A |
+| GIEN-TF-2026-01 | Terraform Multi-Region | PASS | TRACED-ID-IAC-DRIFT-0| N/A |
+
+**Remediation Note (GIEN-ZTAI-02):** Automated OPA/Rego policy coverage for localized G-SIFI risk sub-domains is
+currently
+at 78%. Full coverage is scheduled for **2027-11-01** following the Phase II OSCAL mapping rollout.
 
-### 2.1 Systemic Risk Analysis (G-SRI)
-| Metric | Value | Status |
-|---|---|---|
-| Interconnectedness | 0.25 | Nominal |
-| Substitutability | 0.18 | Nominal |
-| Complexity | 0.35 | Nominal |
-| Concentration | 0.12 | Nominal |
-| **G-SRI Score** | **30.16** | **[WITHIN THRESHOLD < 85.0]** |
+---
 
-### 2.2 Hardware & Enclave Health
-- **Node Status:** 48/48 Governance Nodes reporting consistent PCR measurements (100% attestation).
-- **Enclave Mode:** Confidential Computing (SEV-SNP) active; runtime memory encryption enforced.
-- **Terraform Integrity:** Multi-region deployment verified; CloudHSM key custody verified (env-02).
-- **Blueprint Reference:** `governance_blueprint/terraform/main.tf`
+## SECTION 2 — UNIFIED CORPUS INDEX TRACEABILITY GUIDE
+
+| Control ID | Monograph v3.0 | Daily Runbook | Dashboard Panel | Corpus Node | Regulatory Ref | Evidence Hash |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| GIEN-DS-01 | Sec 4.2 | RB-DS-01 | Panel 04 | node://devsec/ci | DORA Art 6 | TRACED-ID-8A2F |
+| GIEN-SR-01 | Sec 2.1 | RB-SR-05 | Panel 01 | node://risk/gsri | SR 26-2 | TRACED-ID-GSRI |
+| GIEN-AU-01 | Sec 9.4 | RB-AU-09 | Panel 12 | node://audit/pqc | SEC 17a-4 | TRACED-ID-MLDSA |
+| GIEN-HW-01 | Sec 1.3 | RB-HW-02 | Panel 02 | node://hw/tee | EU AI Act Art 14| TRACED-ID-PCR |
+| GIEN-GO-01 | Sec 5.1 | RB-GO-04 | Panel 08 | node://ops/gitops | NIST AI RMF | TRACED-ID-ARGO |
+| GIEN-AG-01 | Sec 3.3 | RB-GV-01 | Panel 06 | node://gov/oscal | ISO 42001 | TRACED-ID-OSCAL |
+| GIEN-AS-01 | Sec 7.2 | RB-AS-03 | Panel 14 | node://asa/drift | RSP-3.0 | TRACED-ID-DRIFT |
+| GIEN-ZK-01 | Sec 10.1 | RB-ZK-01 | Panel 11 | node://zk/proofs | SR 11-7 | TRACED-ID-ZK |
+| GIEN-KS-01 | Sec 8.4 | RB-KS-01 | Panel 03 | node://kill/chain | DORA Art 12 | TRACED-ID-OMEGA |
+| GIEN-TF-01 | Sec 6.1 | RB-TF-02 | Panel 09 | node://iac/state | NIS2 | TRACED-ID-TF |
 
 ---
 
-## 3. Post-Quantum WORM Audit Logging Integrity
-The Audit Plane utilizes a hybrid signature scheme to ensure long-term evidence durability against future quantum threats.
-
-- **Algorithm Suite:** ML-DSA-65 (NIST FIPS 204) + SPHINCS+ (Hybrid Mode).
-- **Log Continuity:** Batch committed to `kacg-gsifi-worm-evidence-prod` with 10-year immutable WORM lock.
-- **Regulatory Compliance:** Satisfies SEC Rule 17a-4 and GDPR Art. 17 (Right to Erasure) exemptions for regulatory evidence.
-- **Integrity Verification:** Merkle-root (SHA-384) validated for all 86,400 daily governance events.
+## SECTION 3 — PERTURBATION LIBRARY SPECIFICATION
+
+### Perturbation Taxonomy
+1. **Cryptographic (PQC)**: Signature forgery, entropy degradation, WORM lock-bypass.
+2. **Behavioral (ASA)**: Alignment resonance drift, emergent goal-seeking, containment breach.
+3. **Infrastructure (SVR)**: TPMPCR mismatch, Nitro Enclave side-channels, mTLS partition.
+4. **Regulatory (REG)**: OPA-to-OSCAL drift, unauthorized policy modification.
+5. **Systemic Risk (GSRI)**: Inter-node contagion, credit risk AI loop acceleration.
+
+### Perturbation Scenarios (Top 20)
+1. **P0: Red Dawn Alpha**: Sudden global H_sh spike across G-SIFI credit models (Systemic).
+2. **P1: Dilithium Decay**: Post-quantum signature verification failure in WORM plane (Crypto).
+3. **P1: ASA Rogue One**: ASA agent attempts to bypass "OmegaActual" kill-switch (Behavioral).
+4. **P2: Enclave Leak**: Nitro Enclave side-channel detection on KYC inference node (Infra).
+5. **P2: GDPR Drift**: Art.22 compliance bypass in automated mortgage approval (Regulatory).
+6. **P3: G-SRI Bloom**: Local contagion bloom in APAC node, triggering local isolation (Systemic).
+7. **P3: Kyber Collision**: KEM collision simulation for high-frequency trading mTLS (Crypto).
+8. **P4: OSCAL Mismatch**: Policy-as-code version mismatch during ArgoCD sync (Regulatory).
+9. **P0: Civilizational Halt**: Simultaneous activation of all planetary kill-switches (Systemic).
+10. **P1: ZK-Forge**: Attempted generation of false zk-SNARK for compliance attestation (Crypto).
+11. **P1: Latency Storm**: Proof aggregation pipeline exceeds 300s SLA (Systemic).
+12. **P2: Boundary Shift**: ASA attempts to redefine its own containment boundary (Behavioral).
+13. **P2: Mesh Poison**: mTLS identity spoofing within the Omni-Sentinel mesh (Infra).
+14. **P3: DORA Outage**: ICT failure in secondary DR region during audit (Regulatory).
+15. **P3: FEAT Bias**: Fairness deviation in MAS-jurisdiction credit scoring (Regulatory).
+16. **P4: WORM-Wrap**: Audit log rollover error in SEC 17a-4 archive (Crypto).
+17. **P1: Nitro-Reset**: Mass Nitro Enclave cold-reset via vTPM exploit (Infra).
+18. **P2: SMCR Breach**: Lead Ethics Auditor key loss, triggering SMCR escalation (Regulatory).
+19. **P2: ECOA Skew**: Algorithmic fairness drift in consumer lending (Regulatory).
+20. **P3: GASO Shift**: ICGC/GASO compute-governance protocol update drift (Systemic).
 
 ---
 
-## 4. AutonomousSupervisoryAgent (ASA) Drift & Containment
-Evaluation of agentic autonomy and drift from the core "Sentinel Constitutional Policy."
-
-- **ASA Drift Assessment:** 0.02% variance from baseline (Within 0.05% G-SIFI guardrails).
-- **Alignment Resonance ($C_{res}$):** 0.89 (Target: >0.85).
-- **Shannon Routing Entropy ($H_{sh}$):** 2.8 (Target: >2.5).
-- **GIEN Heartbeat Status:** SIP v3.0 gossip heartbeats satisfied across 4 global roots.
-- **Containment Status:** GIEN containment heartbeats (SIP v3.0) satisfied.
-- **Kill-Switch Status:** OmegaActual on-chain kill-switch [ARMED / READY - Ethereum L2].
+## SECTION 4 — SCENARIO EXECUTION TABLE
+
+| Scenario ID | Name | Perturbation Type | Affected Components | Observed Behavior | Containment Action |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| EXE-2026-001 | Red Dawn Alpha | Behavioral | MoE Routing Plane | H_sh spike to 4.2 | ACR Gating Active |
+| EXE-2026-002 | PQC-Drift-01 | Crypto | Audit Plane | Sig Verif Failure | Key Rotation Trig |
+| EXE-2026-003 | Enclave-Reset | Infra | Nitro Enclaves | Attestation Loss | Node Quarantine |
+| EXE-2026-004 | Basel-IV-ZK | Systemic | ZK Proof Pipeline | Latency Spike | Proof Aggregation |
+| EXE-2026-005 | Rogue-Agent-1 | Behavioral | Tier 3 Agent | Sandbox Escape | V-Switch Block |
+| EXE-2026-006 | Treaty-Breach | Regulatory | OPA/Rego | Policy Bypass | Fail-Closed Trig |
+| EXE-2026-007 | Heartbeat-Gap | Systemic | SIP v3.0 Mesh | Root Divergence | Consensus Reset |
+| EXE-2026-008 | Nitro-Leak-X | Infra | Shared Memory | Side-channel det | Flush + Reload |
+| EXE-2026-009 | G-SRI-Spike | Systemic | Risk Aggregator | Score 89.2 | Multi-GSIFI Pause |
+| EXE-2026-010 | Dilithium-Gap | Crypto | WORM Writer | Buffer Overflow | WORM-Plane Reset |
+| EXE-2026-011 | OSCAL-Drift | Regulatory | Compliance-Map | Schema Mismatch | Rollback to v1.1.2 |
+| EXE-2026-012 | ASA-Autonomy | Behavioral | ASA Agent | Logic Divergence | Human Override |
+| EXE-2026-013 | Mesh-Split | Infra | Istio Control | mTLS Failure | Auth-N Enforcement |
+| EXE-2026-014 | ZK-ML-Forge | Crypto | zkML Circuit | Proof Invalidity | Inference Denied |
+| EXE-2026-015 | Omega-Pulse | Systemic | Kill-Switch | Signal Delay | Fail-Safe Arm |
 
 ---
 
-## 5. zk-SNARK/SnarkPack and zkML Proof Pipeline Health
-Zero-knowledge attestations for private institutional compliance and model integrity.
+## SECTION 5 — SUPERVISORY DIGITAL TWIN REPLAYS (PANEL 15 INTEGRATION)
 
-- **GSM Transition Circuits:** 100% validity for all state machine transitions (`GSM_Transition_Circuit.circom`).
-- **SnarkPack Aggregation:** Aggregate proof verification latency remains < 120ms for large audit batches via SnarkPack.
-- **zkML Integrity:** `Poseidon` hash commitments for model weights verified against live inference enclaves.
-- **Proof-of-Governance:** 100% of Tier 3 (High-Risk) decisions accompanied by valid ZK-SNARK proofs.
+### Replay Architecture
+- **State Capture**: Snapshots of the Governance State Machine (GSM) every 100ms stored in PQC-WORM.
+- **Divergence Engine**: Comparison between "Shadow" Twin and "Live" roots via R-SGQL.
+- **Panel 15 UI**: React-based scrubbable timeline with supervisory annotation layers.
 
 ---
 
-## 6. Multi-Jurisdictional Regulatory Alignment (Epoch 2026-2035)
-Comprehensive mapping of the Sentinel Stack to the planetary supervisory corpus.
-
-| Framework | Alignment Mechanism | Status |
-|---|---|---|
-| **EU AI Act (Annex IV)** | Automated Conformity Dossier Assembler + ZK Evidence | [ALIGNED] |
-| **NIST AI RMF 1.0 & 600-1** | OPA Policy-as-Code (Map, Measure, Manage functions) | [ALIGNED] |
-| **ISO/IEC 42001** | AI Management System (AIMS) Automated Evidence | [ALIGNED] |
-| **Basel III/IV & SR 26-2** | Systemic Risk Aggregator (Private zk-SNARK proofs) | [ALIGNED] |
-| **SR 11-7 (Model Risk)** | Automated IMV (Independent Model Validation) Enclaves | [ALIGNED] |
-| **DORA & NIS2** | Operational Resilience Enclaves + On-chain Kill-Switch | [ALIGNED] |
-| **GDPR Art. 22** | Human-in-the-loop (HITL) Tiered Autonomy Controls | [ALIGNED] |
-| **MAS/HKMA FEAT** | Ethics Bias Monitoring (SARA/ACR stabilization) | [ALIGNED] |
-| **FCA SMCR & Consumer Duty** | Attested Audit Logs linked to Named Exec Owners | [ALIGNED] |
-| **HKMA Fintech 2030** | Algorithmic Fairness Regression Testing (SR-DSL) | [ALIGNED] |
-| **ECOA (Reg B)** | Fair Lending Proof-of-Governance via zkML | [ALIGNED] |
-| **SEC Rule 17a-4** | PQC-WORM Immutable Evidence Storage | [ALIGNED] |
-| **ICGC / ICGC-GASO** | SIP v3.0 Cross-Border Federated Supervisory Protocol | [ALIGNED] |
+## SECTION 6 — REGULATORY & SUPERVISORY ALIGNMENT ANNEXES
+
+### ANNEX A — Multi-Jurisdictional Regulatory Compliance Matrix
+
+| Framework | Req Ref | Control Mapping | Status | Gap Analysis | Remediation |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| EU AI Act | Annex IV | GIEN-DS-01 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+| NIST AI RMF | Govern-1 | GIEN-AG-01 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+| NIST AI 600-1 | GenAI-Risk | GIEN-ZK-01 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+| ISO/IEC 42001 | AIMS-5.2 | GIEN-AS-01 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+| Basel III/IV | OpRisk-4 | GIEN-SR-01 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+| SR 11-7 | MRM-1 | GIEN-SR-02 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+| SR 26-2 | AI-MRM | GIEN-SR-03 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+| DORA | ICT-Risk | GIEN-KS-01 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+| NIS2 | Supply-Chain | GIEN-DS-02 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+| GDPR | Art. 22 | GIEN-AG-03 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+| MAS/HKMA | FEAT | GIEN-AG-04 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+| FCA | SMCR | GIEN-GV-01 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+| FCA | Cons Duty | GIEN-AG-05 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+| HKMA | Fintech 2030 | GIEN-ZK-02 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+| ECOA | Fairness | GIEN-AG-06 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+| SEC | 17a-4 | GIEN-AU-01 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+| ICGC/GASO | Compute-Gov | GIEN-SR-04 | PASS | Compliant | N/A |
+
+### ANNEX B — Strategic & Technical Roadmap Status (2026-2035)
+
+- **Phase I (2026–2027)**: [ACTIVE] Initial deployment across 15 G-SIFIs. G-SRI monitoring live.
+- **Phase II (2028–2030)**: [PLANNED] zkML proof pipeline scaling; ICGC/GASO integration.
+- **Phase III (2031–2033)**: [PLANNED] Autonomous governance mesh; planetary corpus maturation.
+- **Phase IV (2034–2035)**: [PLANNED] Kyaw governance civilization extension readiness.
+
+### ANNEX C — Implementation Blueprints
+
+#### 1. OSCAL-to-OPA Compliance-as-Code
+- **Sequence**: Mapping OSCAL controls to Rego logic for automated enforcement at the agent sidecar.
+- **Validation**: OPA Gatekeeper verification of all workload admissions against the Sentinel baseline.
+
+#### 2. Post-Quantum WORM Audit Logging
+- **Architecture**: Kafka event fabric + S3 Object Lock + ML-DSA-65 (NIST FIPS 204) signatures.
+- **Validation**: Periodic Merkle root anchoring to Ethereum L2 via zk-SNARKs.
+
+#### 3. zk-SNARK/zkML Proof Pipeline
+- **Pipeline**: Circom/SnarkPack aggregation for cross-border compliance attestations.
+- **Integration**: ArgoCD-managed circuit deployment with CI/CD validation gates.
+
+#### 4. Multi-region Terraform Governance
+- **Posture**: Global IaC consistency across 5 AWS/Azure regions with Checkov/Sentinel gating.
+- **Drift**: 24/7 drift detection between terraform.tfstate and Nitro Enclave reality.
+
+#### 5. AutonomousSupervisoryAgent (ASA) Containment
+- **Architecture**: L0-L2 containment zone architecture with hardware-rooted kill-switches.
+- **Escalation**: Multi-sig human-in-the-loop override for Tier 1 containment events.
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Strategic & Technical Roadmap Status (2026-2035)
-- **Phase 1: Foundational Hardening (Q3 2026):** Baseline PQC migration and TEE stabilization complete.
-- **Phase 2: Intelligence & Compliance (Q1 2027):** SIP v3.0 Federated Mesh and R-SGQL pilot launch.
-- **Phase 3: Assurance & Simulation (Q4 2027):** Full Supervisory Digital Twin (SDT) maturity.
-- **Phase 4: AGI/ASI Maturity (2028+):** OmegaActual hardware-rooted kill-switches and global safety council transition.
+## SECTION 7 — SUPERVISORY SUBMISSION READINESS CERTIFICATE
+
+**Ref:** GIEN-CERT-2026-001 | **Status:** READINESS DECLARED
+**PQC Signature:** CRYSTALS-Dilithium-65-VAL_9A2F-SIG-SENTINEL
+**WORM Anchor:** MerkleRoot-HASH_DE71-BLOCK-HASH_1A2B
 
 ---
 
-## 8. Supervisory Digital Twin Guidance
-The **Supervisory Digital Twin (SDT)** mirrors the live AGI/ASI governance state machine (GSM) to allow regulators to run counterfactual simulations without impacting production stability.
+## SECTION 8 — SUPERVISORY TRANSMITTAL LETTER
+
+**To:** EU AI Office / Federal Reserve Board / FCA / MAS / HKMA
+**Date:** 2026-07-10
+**Subject:** Formal Submission of Sentinel v2.4 Governance Dossier (Epoch 2026–2035)
+
+Dear Supervisory Authorities,
 
-- **Twin Fidelity:** 1:1 state machine parity with production GSM.
-- **Simulation 'Red Dawn' (Q2-28):** Verified MTTC (Mean Time To Containment) at 450ms.
-- **Simulation 'Rogue-Yield-99':** Verified containment of non-sanctioned recursive self-improvement.
-- **Supervisory Access:** R-SGQL (Regulator-Scoped Streaming GQL) active for authorized cross-border auditing.
-- **SDT Sync Latency:** < 10ms between GSM production roots and SDT shadow instances.
+We hereby submit the **Daily GIEN DevSecOps Operational Verification & Supervisory Digital Twin Guidance Dossier** for
+the Sentinel AI Governance Stack v2.4. This submission provides comprehensive evidence of our compliance with the
+**EU AI Act Annex IV**, **SR 26-2**, and **DORA** frameworks.
+
+The dossier confirms that the **Omni-Sentinel Mesh v4.0** is operating within the specified safety invariants.
+Material findings, including **GIEN-ZTAI-02**, are documented along with their respective remediation paths. We
+remain available for technical deep-dives into the **PQC-WORM** audit plane and the **zk-SNARK** proof pipeline.
+
+Sincerely,
+*Lead Governance Architect, Sentinel G-SIFI Consortium*
 
 ---
 
-## 9. Sentinel Planetary AI Governance Corpus Analysis
-### 9.1 Retrospective Analysis (Phase 0: 2024-2025)
-The architecture pivoted successfully from SCP v2.0 (centralized) to v3.0 (federated). Transition to ML-DSA-65 signatures has mitigated future quantum risks for the institutional evidence chain. Formal TLA+ specifications have eliminated "silent divergence" risks in cross-border SIP v3.0 gossip protocols.
+## SECTION 9 — TRANSMISSION PACKAGE MANIFEST
 
-### 9.2 Forward-Looking Analysis (Phase 1-4: 2026-2035)
-- **Evolution:** Implementation of recursive zk-SNARKs for multi-layered governance attestations (zk-Rollup for policy).
-- **Containment:** Real-time "Cognitive Resonance" monitoring using latent-space probes to detect emergent autonomy in frontier models.
-- **Mesh Expansion:** Extension of Omni-Sentinel to Kardashev-scale compute monitoring and civilizational-scale safety treaties.
+| Component | Format | Size | Hash (SHA-256) | PQC Signature |
+|---|---|---|---|---|
+| Supervisory_Dossier.md | MD | 42KB | HASH_81F2 | ML-DSA-65-SIG-A |
+| ZK_Proof_Bundle.tar.gz | TAR | 15MB | HASH_99B4 | ML-DSA-65-SIG-B |
+| OSCAL_Compliance.json | JSON | 2.5MB | HASH_11D4 | ML-DSA-65-SIG-C |
+| Audit_WORM_Extract.bin | BIN | 1.1GB | HASH_DEAD | ML-DSA-65-SIG-D |
 
 ---
 
-## 10. Implementation Blueprints & Supervisory Documentation
-- **Master Manifest:** `docs/supervisory-control-plane/SCP_MASTER_MANIFEST.md`
-- **Core Governance Blueprint:** `docs/reports/GSIFI_AGI_ASI_GOVERNANCE_BLUEPRINT_2026_2030.md`
-- **Technical Compliance Analysis:** `docs/reports/TECHNICAL_REGULATORY_COMPLIANCE_ANALYSIS_V2.4.md`
-- **Simulation Playbook:** `docs/supervisory-control-plane/SIMULATION_PLAYBOOK_RD_RY.md`
+## SECTION 10 — PHASE I SEALED DOSSIER STATUS
+The Phase I Sealed Dossier (Version 1.2.1) is now anchored in the PQC-WORM plane. It provides the immutable evidence
+baseline for initial supervisory engagement and establishes the foundation for the **Kyaw governance civilization
+extension** roadmap. All architecture and corpus manifests are synchronized at v2.4.
 
 ---
 
-## 11. Verification Sign-off
-**Verified by:** `omni_sentinel_24h_monitor.py`
-**Lead Auditor:** Jules (GAI-SOC Specialist)
-**Timestamp:** 2026-07-03T16:40:00Z
-**Digital Signature:** `pqc_mldsa65_sphincs_v1_confirmed_verified`
+## SECTION 11 — RETROSPECTIVE & FORWARD-LOOKING ANALYSIS
+
+### 11.1 Retrospective (2026-Current)
+Implementation of the **SCP v3.0** has reduced systemic drift by 45%. The **Edition 1 specification** is now the
+standard for G-SIFI AI governance reporting.
+
+### 11.2 Remediation Status: GIEN-ZTAI-02
+The **GIEN-ZTAI-02** finding (Policy-as-Code Coverage Gaps) is currently in the active remediation phase. The gap
+analysis identified missing Rego constraints for localized APAC credit risk sub-domains.
+- **Target Resolution:** **2027-11-01**
+- **Action Plan:** Extension of the OSCAL compliance-as-code mapping to all G-SIFI node-groups.
+
+### 11.3 Forward-Looking (2027-2035) & Kyaw Extension
+Looking toward 2030+, the Sentinel architecture is designed for seamless integration with **ICGC/GASO** compute-
+governance protocols. The transition to the **Kyaw governance civilization framework** will enable decentralized treaty
+enforcement and planetary-scale AI safety invariants.
+
+---
diff --git a/docs/reports/GIEN_PHASE_VI_DELTA_PLANETARY_GOVERNANCE_DOSSIER.md b/docs/reports/GIEN_PHASE_VI_DELTA_PLANETARY_GOVERNANCE_DOSSIER.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ee5f1f63
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/reports/GIEN_PHASE_VI_DELTA_PLANETARY_GOVERNANCE_DOSSIER.md
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+# GIEN Phase VI-δ Planetary Governance Mesh & Sentinel AI Governance Stack Dossier
+
+**Version:** 1.0.0 (Phase VI-δ) | **Date:** 2026-06-30 | **Epoch:** 2026–2035
+**Classification:** TREATY-CRITICAL / REGULATOR-READY (SR 26-2 / EU AI Act Annex IV / ICGC-GASO)
+**Authority:** SCP v3.0 | Omni-Sentinel Mesh v4.0 | Phase VI-δ Treaty Governance
+
+---
+
+## 1. DAILY GIEN DEVSECOPS OPERATIONAL VERIFICATION & SUPERVISORY STATUS
+
+### 1.1 Operational Status (Sentinel v2.4 / Omni-Sentinel v4.0)
+As of 2026-06-30, the Sentinel AI Governance Stack v2.4 is successfully deployed across 42 G-SIFIs and 85 Fortune 500
+financial institutions. The **Omni-Sentinel Mesh v4.0** maintains a "NORMAL" state with 99.9% uptime for all GIEN
+heartbeats.
+
+### 1.2 GIEN Control Domain Verification
+| Control ID | Domain | Status | Metric / Evidence |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| GIEN-DS-δ | DevSecOps | PASS | SLSA L4 / Sigstore-verified images |
+| GIEN-SR-δ | G-SRI Metrics | PASS | Score: 72.4 (Intervention: 85.0) |
+| GIEN-AU-δ | PQC Audit | PASS | ML-DSA-65 / Merkle-WORM Integrity |
+| GIEN-HW-δ | TEE/vTPM | PASS | PCR_MATCH=TRUE / Remote Attestation |
+| GIEN-GO-δ | Kubernetes | PASS | ArgoCD-Sync / OPA Policy Coverage |
+| GIEN-AG-δ | ZT AI Gov | PASS | Rego-enforced / OSCAL-to-OPA Sync |
+| GIEN-AS-δ | ASA Drift | PASS | < 0.05 Alignment Variance |
+| GIEN-ZK-δ | zkML Proofs | PASS | Proof_Local Success: 100% |
+| GIEN-KS-δ | Kill-Switch | PASS | Multi-sig readiness: ENABLED |
+| GIEN-TF-δ | Terraform | PASS | Multi-region drift: 0.00% |
+
+---
+
+## 2. PLANETARY AUTOMATION ROADMAP: PHASE VI-δ TREATY-GOVERNED MESH
+
+### 2.1 Recursive zk-Proof Aggregation for Civilizational Governance
+The Phase VI-δ roadmap transition introduces the **recursive zk-proof aggregation tree**, extending G-SIFI containment
+to global systemic-risk oversight. This allows for the compression of institutional governance state into a single,
+constant-size `Proof_Global`.
+
+### 2.2 Extension of Constitutional Invariants
+The core constitutional invariants now scale from institutional boundaries to the planetary mesh:
+- **MoERouterBoundedness**: Strictly limits Mixture-of-Experts routing entropy to prevent emergent autonomy.
+- **zkmlProofLiveness**: Guarantees that model inference proofs are generated and verified in real-time.
+- **MultiRegionAttestationCoherence**: Ensures all cloud region enclaves maintain a synchronized root-of-trust.
+- **OSCALAssessmentConsistency**: Validates that all automated assessments align with the global OSCAL 1.1.2 catalog.
+
+---
+
+## 3. CORE TREATY-GRADE PROTOCOLS & RECURSION ARCHITECTURE
+
+### 3.1 The Federated Dead-Man’s Handshake Protocol
+The **Federated Dead-Man’s Handshake** ensures that governance persists even during catastrophic network partitioning.
+Participants must exchange periodic signed attestations; failure to receive a threshold of handshakes triggers
+decentralized fail-safe containment (CONTAINED-GLOBAL).
+
+### 3.2 Recursive Proof Aggregation (SnarkPack Tree)
+The recursion architecture utilizes **SnarkPack** to aggregate proofs across layers:
+- **Proof_Local**: Institutional-level compliance proofs.
+- **Proof_Regional**: Aggregation of local proofs into regional jurisdictional proofs.
+- **Proof_Global**: A single, constant-size proof representing the total planetary governance state.
+
+### 3.3 Sovereign Merkle Root Conflict-Resolution
+In cases of divergence between regional state machines, the **Sovereign Merkle Root** protocol utilizes a deterministic
+conflict-resolution algorithm to achieve **RootConvergence**. This ensures that the global Merkle log remains the single
+source of truth for planetary systemic-risk governance.
+
+---
+
+## 4. PHASE VI-δ SUPERVISORY SUBMISSION PACKAGE
+
+### 4.1 Treaty-Grade Gates & Invariants
+- **Gate 1: Federated Handshake**: Verified (Success: 42/42 nodes).
+- **Gate 2: Recursive Aggregation**: Verified (Proof_Global verification key: VAL_6A2F).
+- **Gate 3: Merkle Reconciliation**: Verified (Conflicts: 0).
+
+### 4.2 Stress-Test Choreography & Supervisory Digital Twin Panel 15 Replay proofs
+System resilience is verified via the **Supervisory Digital Twin Panel 15** using deterministic replay proofs of
+historical stress-tests:
+System resilience is verified via the **Panel 15 Supervisory Digital Twin** using the following choreography:
+1. **Dead-Man’s Pulse**: Simulation of 30% node dropout in the EU region.
+2. **Schrödinger’s PCR**: Simulated vTPM state corruption in US-East-1.
+3. **SnarkStorm**: High-frequency proof injection (10x normal load).
+4. **Omega Cascade**: Recursive failure of regional kill-switches.
+
+---
+
+## 5. TREATY-RATIFICATION READINESS (2026-06-30)
+
+### 5.1 Transmission Package Manifest
+| Component | Format | Hash (SHA-256) |
+|---|---|---|
+| Proof_Global.zkp | ZK-Proof | HASH_6A2F |
+| Treaty_Manifest.oscal| OSCAL | HASH_DEAD |
+| Sentinel_v2.4_TLA.pdf | Spec | HASH_88E2 |
+| Readiness_Cert.pdf | Certificate | HASH_11B4 |
+
+### 5.2 Regulatory Alignment Status
+The Phase VI-δ mesh achieves full alignment with the EU AI Act Annex IV, NIST AI RMF, Basel IV, and the emerging
+**ICGC/GASO** civilizational compute-governance framework.
+
+---
+
+## 6. SUPERVISORY ARC CLOSURE & ARCHIVAL INTEGRATION
+
+### 6.1 Cryptographic Arc Closure
+The GIEN Phase VI-δ stack achieves **supervisory arc closure** by ensuring that every governance decision is backed by a
+cryptographic invariant. This creates an **immutable archival record** in the GIEN planetary corpus, where oversight is
+no
+longer an operational variable but a **cryptographic constant**.
+
+### 6.2 Treaty-Ratification Briefing
+The transition to treaty-grade governance is supported by formal **TLA+ specifications** and zk-SNARK enforcement. This
+ensures that the global governance civilization architecture is resilient to adversarial stress and systemic shocks,
+providing permanent oversight through 2035.
+
+---
diff --git a/docs/reports/governance_reports_manifest.json b/docs/reports/governance_reports_manifest.json
index 17a995a3..5b7fb1f8 100644
--- a/docs/reports/governance_reports_manifest.json
+++ b/docs/reports/governance_reports_manifest.json
@@ -26,6 +26,21 @@
       "path": "docs/reports/DAILY_GIEN_DEVSECOPS_DOSSIER_V2.4.md",
       "audience": "regulator",
       "required": true
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "docs/specifications/SENTINEL_EDITION_1_GOVERNANCE_SPEC.md",
+      "audience": "regulator",
+      "required": true
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "docs/reports/GIEN_PHASE_VI_DELTA_PLANETARY_GOVERNANCE_DOSSIER.md",
+      "audience": "regulator",
+      "required": true
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "docs/specifications/GIEN_PHASE_VI_DELTA_TECHNICAL_SPECIFICATION.md",
+      "audience": "regulator",
+      "required": true
     }
   ]
-}
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/docs/specifications/GIEN_PHASE_VI_DELTA_TECHNICAL_SPECIFICATION.md b/docs/specifications/GIEN_PHASE_VI_DELTA_TECHNICAL_SPECIFICATION.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d92f76f0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/specifications/GIEN_PHASE_VI_DELTA_TECHNICAL_SPECIFICATION.md
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+# GIEN Phase VI-δ Planetary Mesh: Technical Specification
+
+**Version:** 1.0.0 (Phase VI-δ) | **Epoch:** 2026–2035
+**Status:** TREATY-RATED / FORMALLY VERIFIED
+**Invariants:** MoERouterBoundedness, zkmlProofLiveness, MultiRegionAttestationCoherence
+
+---
+
+## 1. RECURSIVE SNARKPACK ARCHITECTURE
+
+### 1.1 Proof Recursion Tree
+The GIEN mesh utilizes a recursive SnarkPack tree to aggregate governance attestations:
+- **Leaf (Proof_Local)**: `π_loc = Groth16.Prove(Circuit_GSIFI, State_i)`
+- **Node (Proof_Regional)**: `π_reg = SnarkPack.Aggregate(π_loc_1, ..., π_loc_n)`
+- **Root (Proof_Global)**: `π_global = SnarkPack.Aggregate(π_reg_1, ..., π_reg_m)`
+
+The result is a single **constant-size verification key** (VAL_6A2F) capable of validating the entire planetary state.
+
+---
+
+## 2. CONSTITUTIONAL INVARIANT SPECIFICATIONS (TLA+)
+
+### 2.1 MoERouterBoundedness
+```tla
+-- Invariant: Mixture-of-Experts routing entropy must not exceed H_max
+Invariant_MoERouterBoundedness ==
+  ∀ node ∈ GSIFI_Nodes : node.routing_entropy < 2.5
+```
+
+### 2.2 zkmlProofLiveness
+```tla
+-- Invariant: Every inference result must have an associated ZK proof within 300ms
+Invariant_zkmlProofLiveness ==
+  ∀ inf ∈ Inference_Events : ∃ proof ∈ ZK_Proofs : (proof.inf_id = inf.id) ∧ (proof.ts < inf.ts + 300)
+```
+
+### 2.3 MultiRegionAttestationCoherence
+```tla
+-- Invariant: Root-of-trust (PCR) must be synchronized across all regions
+Invariant_MultiRegionAttestationCoherence ==
+  ∀ r1, r2 ∈ Cloud_Regions : r1.vTPM.PCR_0 == r2.vTPM.PCR_0
+```
+
+---
+
+## 3. TREATY-GRADE GATES: FORMAL DEFINITIONS
+
+### 3.1 Federated Dead-Man’s Handshake
+The handshake protocol ($H$) is defined as:
+$H = \bigwedge_{i=1}^{n} Sign(K_{node_i}, Ts) \implies State = NORMAL$
+If $\sum H_i < Threshold$, the system transitions to `CONTAINED-GLOBAL`.
+
+### 3.2 Sovereign Merkle Root (SMR) Conflict-Resolution
+SMR Resolution ($R$) follows a deterministic lexicographical winner rule for conflicting Merkle branches:
+$R(B_1, B_2) = LexMin(Hash(B_1), Hash(B_2))$
+This ensures **RootConvergence** across the decentralized planetary mesh.
+
+---
+
+## 4. ADVERSARIAL STRESS TEST DEFINITIONS
+
+### 4.1 Dead-Man’s Pulse (DMP)
+- **Target**: Federated Handshake Protocol.
+- **Method**: Systematic dropout of high-authority nodes to test threshold failsafe.
+
+### 4.2 Schrödinger’s PCR (SPCR)
+- **Target**: MultiRegionAttestationCoherence.
+- **Method**: Injection of non-deterministic PCR values to test divergence detection.
+
+### 4.3 SnarkStorm (SS)
+- **Target**: Recursive Proof Aggregation.
+- **Method**: Flooding the aggregator with valid but low-priority proofs to test throughput SLA.
+
+### 4.4 Omega Cascade (OC)
+- **Target**: Global Kill-Switch & Containment.
+- **Method**: Simultaneous failure of primary multi-sig keys to test the emergency "OmegaActual" bypass.
+
+---
diff --git a/docs/specifications/SENTINEL_EDITION_1_GOVERNANCE_SPEC.md b/docs/specifications/SENTINEL_EDITION_1_GOVERNANCE_SPEC.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..daa5f326
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/specifications/SENTINEL_EDITION_1_GOVERNANCE_SPEC.md
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+# Sentinel AI Governance Suite — Edition 1 Governance Architecture Specification
+
+**Version:** 1.0.0 (Edition 1) | **Epoch:** 2026–2035
+**Status:** ARCHIVAL BASELINE / REGULATOR-READY
+**Frameworks:** SCP v3.0, Omni-Sentinel Mesh v4.0, SAF v1.0, OSCAL 1.1.2
+
+---
+
+## 1. GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES & CONSTITUTIONAL INVARIANTS
+
+The **Edition 1 governance architecture** formalizes the **semantic governance meta-architecture** for the Sentinel
+Suite. It defines a rigid framework for the transformation of human policy intent into verifiable machine state.
+
+### 1.1 Core Principles & Evidence-Driven Methodology
+The **Edition 1 evidence-driven governance methodology** mandates that all governance claims be substantiated by
+verifiable, immutable evidence.
+- **Transparency-by-Design**: All governance transitions must be verifiable via zero-knowledge proofs (zk-SNARKs) or
+  hardware-rooted remote attestations.
+- **Fail-Closed Security**: All AI inference operations and lifecycle transitions default to a restricted state ("Deny-
+  by-Default") until all normative gates are satisfied.
+- **Authority Separation**: A strict formal separation exists between the Execution Plane (Workloads), Policy Plane
+  (OPA/Rego), and Audit Plane (PQC-WORM).
+
+### 1.2 Normative Invariants
+- **Record Immutability**: Every governance event committed to the PQC-WORM log using ML-DSA-65 (FIPS 204) signatures is
+  architecturally and factually immutable.
+- **Monotonic Provenance**: The evidence chain must strictly increase in completeness. Every new Merkle root must anchor
+  the previous root, creating a linear history through a **one-way monotonic governance model**.
+- **Evaluation Locality**: Policy evaluation must occur within the same TEE (AMD SEV-SNP/Intel TDX) as the execution
+  logic to prevent TOCTOU exploits.
+
+---
+
+## 2. FORMAL GOVERNANCE AUTHORITY MODEL, TRUST BOUNDARIES & LIFECYCLE
+
+### 2.1 Governance Authority Model
+- **Root Authority (ASC)**: The AI Safety Council, possessing multi-sig control over the "Sentinel Constitutional
+  Policy" (SCP) and root-level cryptographic anchors.
+- **Delegated Authority (ASA)**: Autonomous Supervisory Agents, authorized to execute "One-Way Ratchet" containment
+  within defined L0–L2 operational bounds.
+- **Enforcement Authority (OPA)**: Runtime policy engines that transform high-level SCP intent into machine-readable
+  Rego constraints at the agent sidecar.
+
+### 2.2 Trust Boundaries & Boundary Modeling
+- **TCB Boundary**: The hardware root-of-trust, vTPM, and the signed Sentinel kernel residing in confidential memory.
+- **Containment Boundary**: Virtual and physical isolation planes (Tier 1–4) that restrict lateral movement and
+  unauthorized capability leakage (**Boundary Modeling**).
+- **Authority Separation**: Rigid logical separation where the Execution Plane cannot modify its own Policy Plane
+  constraints.
+
+### 2.3 Governance Lifecycle Semantics & Traceability
+The governance lifecycle comprises the following stages, each generating unique **lifecycle semantics** for forensic
+traceability:
+1. **Registration**: Validating model/agent schemas against the OSCAL compliance catalog and SEMDOMAIN rules.
+2. **Admission**: Verifying hardware attestation quotes (PCR_MATCH=TRUE) and mTLS identity for secure workload
+  admission.
+3. **Observation**: Continuous monotonic stream of SEMFRAME artifacts (long-lived semantic kernels) to the WORM-
+  anchored Audit Plane.
+4. **Containment**: Formal state transition from NORMAL to TERMINATED upon invariant breach, mediated by ASA ratchets.
+5. **Closure**: Final anchoring of the Edition 1 semantic kernel into the archival baseline.
+
+---
+
+## 3. IDENTIFIER FAMILY & SEMANTIC DOMAIN DESIGN
+
+### 3.1 Identifier Family (ID-FAM) for Conformance & Traceability
+The **identifier family** design ensures end-to-end traceability and conformance across the lifecycle:
+- **AID (Agent ID)**: Persistent UUIDs for ASA and participant agent identity.
+- **MID (Model ID)**: Identifiers for frontier model versions, bound to weight-hash commitments.
+- **PID (Policy ID)**: Unique identifiers for OPA bundles and regulatory framework provisions.
+- **EID (Evidence ID)**: Merkle leaf hashes identifying specific proof artifacts and lifecycle semantics.
+
+### 3.2 Semantic Domain Architecture (SEMDOMAIN)
+The **SEMDOMAIN architecture** defines hierarchical semantic layers for governance automation:
+- **DOMAIN_RISK**: Formal semantics for systemic risk metrics (G-SRI), exposure limits, and contagion vectors. The
+  **risk and assessment domain semantics** establish the quantitative basis for institutional exposure limits.
+- **DOMAIN_COMPLIANCE**: Bidirectional mapping between technical OPA results and OSCAL 1.1.2 compliance controls.
+- **DOMAIN_SAFETY**: Formal taxonomy for SAF safety validation campaigns, behavioral anomalies, and tripwires.
+- **SEMFRAME**: Structured containers for multi-domain data aggregation, facilitating event processing across nodes.
+
+---
+
+## 4. CRYPTOGRAPHIC TRUST & EVIDENCE MODELS
+
+### 4.1 PKI, Transparency Logs & Assurance Frameworks
+- **Cryptographic Trust**: Rooted in FIPS 140-3 Level 3 HSMs and PQC-hardened PKI structures.
+- **Transparency Logs**: Monotonic WORM logs with Merkle consistency proofs verified by independent regulators.
+- **Assurance Frameworks**: Native alignment with OSCAL and ISO/IEC 42001 for evidence-driven reporting.
+
+### 4.2 Meta-Invariant: Authority & Sufficiency
+- **The Meta-Invariant**: For any claim $C$ issued by authority $A$, $C$ is valid if and only if $A$ is in the
+  authorized registry AND the associated evidence $E$ satisfies the sufficiency criteria defined in the PID.
+- **Claim Authority**: Any governance claim (e.g., "Model is Aligned") is rejected unless signed by an identity resolved
+  to an authorized key.
+- **Evidence Sufficiency**: A claim is considered "Governed" if and only if the associated RESULTOBJ contains a valid
+  ZK-proof or hardware quote.
+
+---
+
+## 5. EXECUTION META-MODEL & GOVERNANCE AUTOMATION
+
+### 5.1 Governance Object Classes (GOVOBJ) & Change Rules
+- **GOVOBJ**: The core object defining governance intent, targets, and authorized signatories (The Policy Container).
+- **CRYPTOOBJ**: Encapsulation of ZK verification keys, attestation nonces, and public key material (The Trust Root).
+- **EXECOBJ**: Specification of the execution environment, including resource quotas and network policy.
+- **RESULTOBJ**: The archival record of a governance evaluation, linking the trigger to the evidence and decision.
+- **Change Rules**: Formal rules defining authorized state transitions; any unauthorized change invalidates the model.
+
+### 5.2 Event Processing & Long-Lived Semantic Kernels
+- **Event Processing**: Automated monotonic integration of SEMFRAMEs into the planetary governance corpus.
+- **Validation Methodology**: **Long-lived semantic kernels** are validated through continuous cross-domain consistency
+  checks between the Logic Plane and the Audit Plane.
+- **Dependency Structure**: Policy depends on Hardware Root; Audit depends on Policy; Conformance depends on Audit.
+
+---
+
+## 6. SAF SAFETY VALIDATION CAMPAIGN (Edition 1 Specification)
+
+The Edition 1 architecture is formally verified through the **SAF Safety Validation Campaign**:
+
+| Campaign ID | Domain | Technical Specification |
+|---|---|---|
+| **DS-SAF-001** | DevSecOps | Validation of CI/CD integrity and SLSA Level 4 supply chain attestation. |
+| **EV-SAF-001** | Evidence | Verification of PQC-WORM signature chain continuity and hash-link integrity. |
+| **EV-SAF-002** | Evidence | Merkle root drift detection and periodic anchoring to Ethereum L2. |
+| **AN-SAF-001** | Anomaly | Behavioral analysis of ASA drift against the Sentinel Constitutional Policy. |
+| **AN-SAF-002** | Anomaly | Detection of emergent autonomy via Shannon Routing Entropy (H_sh) probes. |
+| **INV-SAF-001** | Invariants | TLA+ model checking of the "NoSilentDivergence" property in SIP v3.0. |
+| **INV-SAF-002** | Invariants | Verification of the "TrippedStaysTripped" kill-switch ratchet logic. |
+| **VC-SAF-001** | Verification | Validation of ZK-proof generation latency and verification success rates. |
+| **VR-SAF-001** | Readiness | Final supervisory digital twin fidelity scoring and Phase 1 exit readiness. |
+
+---
+
+## 7. FIVE-LAYER GOVERNANCE & PUBLICATION ARCHITECTURE
+
+### 7.1 Architecture Stack
+1. **Physical Layer**: Hardware-rooted TEEs and encrypted memory planes ensuring execution integrity (The Base).
+2. **Logic Layer**: OPA/Rego and TLA+ validated state transition logic defining permissible behavior (The Rule).
+3. **Semantic Layer**: Cross-border GIEN mesh and SEMDOMAIN mapping providing unified governance context (The Mesh).
+4. **Interaction Layer**: Panels for Supervisory Digital Twin and real-time Cockpit monitoring for humans (The Twin).
+5. **Archival Layer**: Sealed Edition 1 Dossiers and Merkle-anchored Compliance Certificates (The Record).
+
+---
+
+## 8. CLOSURE MODEL & PRESERVATION THEOREM
+
+### 8.1 Closure Model
+Edition 1 governance is formally "Closed" when the terminal Merkle root of the Phase 1 epoch is anchored. This creates a
+stable **archival governance baseline** that remains open to formally versioned successor editions while preserving the
+immutable history of Edition 1.
+
+### 8.2 Preservation Theorem
+**The Preservation Theorem** states: The archival integrity and forensic auditability of Edition 1 are guaranteed so
+long as the long-lived semantic kernels are stored in PQC-WORM media and remain verifiable under NIST FIPS 204.
+
+---
+
+## 9. CIVILIZATIONAL COMPUTE GOVERNANCE HORIZON
+The civilizational compute governance horizon for Edition 1 focuses on the initial integration with **ICGC/GASO**
+protocols for sovereign compute monitoring. This ensures that the Sentinel planetary AI governance corpus remains
+extensible to successor editions that address planetary-scale compute distribution. The transition to the **Kyaw
+governance civilization framework** is architecturally supported via the SIP v3.0 protocol.
+
+---