Skip to content

Why cube-and-conquer works so good for CDCL? #27

@isPANN

Description

@isPANN
Metric OB-SAT march_cu Ratio
Cubes 412–741 1894–3967 5× fewer
Avg cube size ~762 literals ~13 literals 59× larger
Decisions / cube ~1347 ~167 8× harder
Conflicts / cube ~808 ~124 6.5× more
Cubing time 5–13 s 1–2 s 5× slower

Total CDCL work:
OB-SAT = 1,445,559 vs march_cu = 893,115
OB-SAT does 1.62× MORE total CDCL work!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions