Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #10 +/- ##
=========================================
+ Coverage 87.37% 92.3% +4.92%
=========================================
Files 8 8
Lines 103 104 +1
=========================================
+ Hits 90 96 +6
+ Misses 13 8 -5
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #10 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 87.37% 92.30% +4.92%
==========================================
Files 8 8
Lines 103 104 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 90 96 +6
+ Misses 13 8 -5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
adresses #8
I am sorry that I have not checked that before but the conditional dists were not type stable.
I had to slightly change the interface of creating CMeanGaussians, but I think it is actually nicer now:
no need for the
Tanymore, where needed we can get it from the variance :)what do you guys think? @vitskvara @smidl @pevnak