License discrepancy between README.md and LICENSE.md

[MerelyPerfect]

Title: [Docs]: License discrepancy between README.md and LICENSE.md

Description:
There is conflicting licensing information between the project's README and the official LICENSE file. The README.md states that the project is governed by a "Claude Commercial" license, while the actual LICENSE.md file contains the standard text for the MIT License.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Navigate to the README.md file in the root directory.
2. Read the licensing section, which directs users to check License.md for "Claude Commercial" terms.
3. Open the LICENSE.md file.
4. Observe that the text actually contains the open-source MIT License.

Expected Behavior:
The licensing information should be consistent across all repository documentation to ensure legal clarity for users and downstream contributors.

Actual Behavior:

• README.md indicates a commercial/proprietary license.
• LICENSE.md indicates an open-source (MIT) license.

Environment / Affected Version:

• Version: v0.2.82
• Files Affected: README.md, LICENSE.md

Additional Context:
Resolving this ambiguity is critical for compliance and usage rights. Could the maintainers please clarify the intended license and update the respective files to match?

[MerelyPerfect]

Addressed in #975.