VM Deployment using snapshot in new zone#13178
Merged
DaanHoogland merged 3 commits intoMay 21, 2026
Merged
Conversation
vishesh92
reviewed
May 18, 2026
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.22 #13178 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 17.67% 17.67% -0.01%
Complexity 15792 15792
============================================
Files 5922 5922
Lines 533123 533129 +6
Branches 65201 65205 +4
============================================
- Hits 94246 94242 -4
- Misses 428236 428242 +6
- Partials 10641 10645 +4
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
| } else if (templateId == null) { | ||
| throw new InvalidParameterValueException( | ||
| "Could not determine template from snapshot id=" + cmd.getSnapshotId() + | ||
| "; the source volume no longer exists. Please specify a templateId."); |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 17897 |
vladimirpetrov
approved these changes
May 20, 2026
Contributor
vladimirpetrov
left a comment
vladimirpetrov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, I was able to reproduce the issue using the much easier steps, provided by @ingox:
Single zone environment, NFS and local storage pools (not sure if it's related), deploy a VM, create root volume snapshot, try to deploy a new VM using this snapshot. It fails with 'Deployment of virtual machine is supported only for Zone-wide storage pools' error message but it works fine with the patched code.
winterhazel
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2026
* 4.22:
VM Deployment using snapshot in new zone (#13178)
Change exception treatment on incremental snapshot wait (#12665)
Move checkRoleEscalation outside DB transaction in createAccount (#13044)
Fix/flasharray delete rename destroy patch conflict (#13049)
Fix VPC network offerings listing in isolated network creation form (#12645)
systemvm: accept ipv6 established/related return traffic (#13173)
update debian change log
Updating pom.xml version numbers for release 4.22.2.0-SNAPSHOT
Updating pom.xml version numbers for release 4.22.1.0
Update suse15 packaging spec, use qemu-ovmf-x86_64 package instead of edk2-ovmf for agent (#13133)
Change disk-only VM snapshot removal message (#11182)
Update mysql java connector version to 8.4.0 (matching version for MySQL 8.4) (#12640)
adaptive: honor user-provided capacityBytes when provider stats are unavailable (#13059)
Flexibilize public IP selection (#11076)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR...
Fixes: #12443
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?