Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In certain situations I need to use the Dynamodb option to removeUndefinedValues . Currently it doesn't seem like we can pass these options in the arc.tables().
Describe the solution you'd like
I'd like to be able to pass config parameters to the tables() call in order to pass these option to where the Client and DocClient are being instantiated. Maybe something like
const options = {
docConfig: {
marshallOptions: {
convertEmptyValues: false,
removeUndefinedValues: true,
convertClassInstanceToMap: true,
},
unmarshallOptions: {
wrapNumbers: true,
}
};
Describe alternatives you've considered
If it set up my own Dynamo client instance instead of using the arc provided tables() call, users would still have problems because we'd lose the advantages of the main arc functions package.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In certain situations I need to use the Dynamodb option to
removeUndefinedValues. Currently it doesn't seem like we can pass these options in thearc.tables().Describe the solution you'd like
I'd like to be able to pass config parameters to the
tables()call in order to pass these option to where the Client and DocClient are being instantiated. Maybe something likeDescribe alternatives you've considered
If it set up my own Dynamo client instance instead of using the arc provided
tables()call, users would still have problems because we'd lose the advantages of the main arcfunctionspackage.