-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
feat: expose generator hash in REST /api/orders/by-owner response (COW-993) #82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
lgahdl
merged 7 commits into
develop
from
luizhatem/cow-993-f15-rest-apiordersby-owner-response-missing-on-chain
Jun 8, 2026
+82
−5
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
294fc9d
feat: expose generator hash in REST /api/orders/by-owner response (CO…
lgahdl 8804df3
test: add GeneratorSummary schema tests including hash field (COW-993)
lgahdl 4594e5f
fix: correct hash field describe() to use tuple abi.encode notation (…
lgahdl bb80e89
fix: add non-null assertion on orders[0] in test to fix TS2532
lgahdl a418d7b
fix: improve hash field description accuracy — reference ComposableCo…
lgahdl 9281016
test: trim orders-by-owner schema tests to regression-only guards
lgahdl 297ca0d
Merge origin/develop — resolve add/add conflict in orders-by-owner tests
lgahdl File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is it possible has be missing? isn't it required on the schema?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Kept this one — safeParse accepts unknown, so TypeScript has no protection against missing fields at runtime; the test is the only guard here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is a really direct test of the schema, but I am ok on leaving if you think that would be better as well