Problem / Motivation
I can see the recent addition of NEXT_PUBLIC_BASE_PATH, and I think it's a great idea. I can imagine it would only be more and more popular approach to use this, to deploy this project alongside Stalwart on the same domain. The requirement to build a custom image is understandable, but still adds friction.
Proposed Solution
Extend the CI to publish a container image of Bulwark with NEXT_PUBLIC_BASE_PATH=/webmail, tagged as e.g. ghcr.io/bulwarkmail/webmail:v1.7.1-subpath
People who want a custom path will still need to build their own image, but the vast majority will probably just use this image.
Alternatives Considered
No response
Feature Area
Deployment / Configuration
Mockups / Examples
No response
Additional Context
No response
Problem / Motivation
I can see the recent addition of
NEXT_PUBLIC_BASE_PATH, and I think it's a great idea. I can imagine it would only be more and more popular approach to use this, to deploy this project alongside Stalwart on the same domain. The requirement to build a custom image is understandable, but still adds friction.Proposed Solution
Extend the CI to publish a container image of Bulwark with
NEXT_PUBLIC_BASE_PATH=/webmail, tagged as e.g.ghcr.io/bulwarkmail/webmail:v1.7.1-subpathPeople who want a custom path will still need to build their own image, but the vast majority will probably just use this image.
Alternatives Considered
No response
Feature Area
Deployment / Configuration
Mockups / Examples
No response
Additional Context
No response