I think `jconv` was a convolution wrapper that made sure the input and output was the same length. Probably it could be replaced by `smooth` without too much ill effect. Need to test this. I got an email from a user pointing this out.
I think
jconvwas a convolution wrapper that made sure the input and output was the same length.Probably it could be replaced by
smoothwithout too much ill effect. Need to test this.I got an email from a user pointing this out.