Skip to content

Handling of unaccepted/wrong content-type #37

@FiV0

Description

@FiV0

Currently specifying a bad content-type results in a server error. We could do two things to improve the dev experience:

  • Return a 406 Not Acceptable instead of a server error.
  • Include the error and irritating content-type in the response.

The same is probably true for content-language and content-encoding.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions