Currently, we have the following inconsistencies (I analysed batch 1 (before the latest correction, which is still ongoing), 2, 3 and 4):  1. `0`, `7` and `8` are obvious 2. `3` has been answered in #46 -> class 3. `2` is discussed in #48 (please answer there) 4. `5` and `6` is discussed in #49 5. `1` was already discussed in the past 6. `4` I corrected `Co oxide` is a `<class>` based on previous discussions
Currently, we have the following inconsistencies (I analysed batch 1 (before the latest correction, which is still ongoing), 2, 3 and 4):
0,7and8are obvious3has been answered in post-correction validation #46 -> class2is discussed in Overlapping annotations #48 (please answer there)5and6is discussed in Expand the me_method to certain instruments/tecniques? #491was already discussed in the past4I correctedCo oxideis a<class>based on previous discussions