Skip to content

Don't overemphasize limited IRV rankings #17

@wolftune

Description

@wolftune

Sorry to not be concrete in this suggestion, but point is:

Avoid anyone thinking that allowing more than 3 (or even all) candidates to get ranked doesn't solve any of IRV's issues. It should be a side note that IRV calculation and voting is screwy enough to lead to this limitation being common.

This is an implementation detail that is insightful but is not at the heart of the issues.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions