You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
work on issue #155 exposed a few questionable code lines and possible discrepancies between the various approaches to growth. A code review of get_growth2 and get_growth3 seems warranted.
With Linf_decay == -999, the plus group growth uses a decay rate of 0.2 and goes out to 1 * nages. With a positive value for Linf_decay, SS3 uses that value and goes out to 3 * nages.
clarify usage of Linf_decay and its effect on updating size in the plus group in time series; add option -997.
find that the value of t was not properly updated before calling growth3, which caused incorrect values for size in the plus group
document where season duration (VBK_seas) is changed and test by comparing annual, to two 6-month season, to season as year with 6 month season. Do that test for vonB and Richards
run models with null param values to match vonB
demonstrate reasonable range of param valuesclean-up a
clean-up and improve echoinputs in biofxn routine
consider making Gompertz growth a separate function
Add FATAL warning if AFIX2 input value is > nages. Otherwise, incorrect Linf values are calculated and used.