Not longer mantained?

[davidpelayo]

I wonder whether this repo is being maintained or not.

In case not, I will fork and publish it on my own so we can go maintaining this cool idea.

Any feedback?

[davidpelayo]

Relates to #57.
Relates to #50.

[davidpelayo]

I started the new fork on this repo: https://github.com/davidpelayo/orb-latest.

[davidpelayo]

@nnajm are you still up to maintain this repo? Can you transfer the ownership of the domain name to me so I can continue with this project? Thanks in advance.

[ariutta]

@davidpelayo, any chance you'd want to collaborate with @super-cache-money? There's already a forked repo and corresponding NPM package. It'd be great to see development coalesce around one fork as an OPEN Open Source Project.

[davidpelayo]

@ariutta I would agree with that. However, after being thinking a while, I believe it's better to rewrite the solution from the scratch to start a new one. The issue I raised. What do you guys think?

[thecodejack]

Agreed with @davidpelayo. I have improved current version of orb to match excel like features for my work. But I am still facing lot of issues. For example, orb stucks when it is having 3 cols,3 rows and 4 aggregate functions with 10,000 rows of complex data. And there is no easy fix on orb. We need proper open source project. I can help you guys as well.

[ariutta]

I'm fine with a rewrite. Could we keep the same API?

…

On Jun 12, 2017 4:15 AM, "thecodejack" ***@***.***> wrote: Agreed with @davidpelayo <https://github.com/davidpelayo>. I have improved current version of orb to match excel like features for my work. But I am still facing lot of issues. For example, orb stucks when it is having 3 cols,3 rows and 4 aggregate functions with 10,000 rows of complex data. And there is no easy fix on orb. We need proper open source project. I can help you guys as well. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#87 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABPJg81mSE1WnFqDXvDJzqmVP2KqOpoYks5sDR3PgaJpZM4NXriq> .

[super-cache-money]

@davidpelayo rewrite sounds great! It's such a shame that this has stagnated. Please ignore my fork, I haven't/can't work on it at all. I can transfer the npm package rights to you if you'd like.

[davidpelayo]

@super-cache-money @ariutta I even thought of renaming the package (already created a repo for it). We can start with this current package as a legacy solution, so we can go fixing and iterating it for the community, if needed.
In parallel, starting a new fresh solution with the new API, while consistently founding the contributors circle and establish the guidelines.

Who is willing to really contribute to the development?
Please contact me so we can bootstrap this thing asap.

[ariutta]

Realistically, I've probably only got time for testing and bug-fixing at the moment.

[ariutta]

If you're doing a rewrite, you may be interested in taking a look at the library tad. It's currently packaged as an Electron app, but much of the code would be useful for an in-browser pivot table.

[thecodejack]

@davidpelayo I can help over the weekends.

[turnerniles]

Hi @nnajm, @davidpelayo, @jsegura, @ariutta, @super-cache-money, @cohenoshri and all. We are facing the challenge of pivoting "large" amounts of data in browser. And want a similar experience to orb and PivotTable.js. We are working on react-virtualized-pivot and the pivot engine, quick-pivot. We're still trying to reach feature parity with orb and have come quite a long way. Let me know what you think. We would appreciate any help and feedback if you're interested in the project. Please open issues as you see fit. We have a ways to go.