Benchmark vs panates/postgrejs

[dougg0k]

Hey,

Could you add another library in your benchmark?

https://github.com/panates/postgrejs

[mattbishop]

@dougg0k it seems right that you would contribute a pull request for this!

[dougg0k]

Does it? You dont seem to be a contributor, how would you know?

Many issues in the repository, yet this got a fast response.

Perhaps it is fit for you to give fast responses in the others too?

[mattbishop]

I'd rather the maintainer spend their time fixing issues with the library rather than writing another benchmark that can be contributed by someone who is interested in the new benchmark. That's pretty standard for open source projects.

[porsager]

Thanks @mattbishop ! I really hope to find the time to give Postgres.js the TLC it deserves soon!

[dougg0k]

But that's on the maintainer, as he spends his time on what he wants.

[porsager]

Exactly @dougg0k but that doesn't make it wrong for @mattbishop to suggest you could do it ;) Also - I am the maintainer and I agree with matt here, so to answer your first question - I likely won't add anything to this benchmark. Both due to time constraints, but also because the benchmark doesn't cover enough to base a choice of framework on.

Also people should do their own benchmarks for their specific use case.

[dougg0k]

For sure. Sounds good. Feel free to close the issue.

[porsager]

I moved it to the correct repo - who knows if someone wants to do it :)