-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathbinary_classifier.py
More file actions
240 lines (194 loc) · 9.65 KB
/
binary_classifier.py
File metadata and controls
240 lines (194 loc) · 9.65 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
import os
import sys
import math
from itertools import product
import numpy
import pandas
import lightgbm
from sklearn.preprocessing import MinMaxScaler
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, f1_score, precision_score, recall_score, balanced_accuracy_score # evan got mad at me for balanced_accuracy :( but alik said its fine so take that FWIW
from scipy.stats import pearsonr
import shap
import gridcv
'''
Vars
'''
rootPath = ""
dataPath = ""
targetPath = ""
savePath = ""
artificialBalance = False # if classes are imbalanced, set true to artificially inflate minority class. lightgbm includes a way to penalize minority class heavily, so not needed necessarily and not implemented
dropna = False
testSetSize = 0.2
validSetSize = 0.2
subject = ""
session = ""
foldAccuracy = pandas.DataFrame(columns = ['Fold 1', 'Fold 2', 'Fold 3', 'Fold 4', 'Fold 5'])
foldPrecision = pandas.DataFrame(columns = ['Fold 1', 'Fold 2', 'Fold 3', 'Fold 4', 'Fold 5'])
foldRecall = pandas.DataFrame(columns = ['Fold 1', 'Fold 2', 'Fold 3', 'Fold 4', 'Fold 5'])
foldF1 = pandas.DataFrame(columns = ['Fold 1', 'Fold 2', 'Fold 3', 'Fold 4', 'Fold 5'])
'''
Data Loading
'''
input = pandas.read_csv(dataPath)
targets = pandas.read_csv(targetPath)
'''
Data Preprocessing
'''
if dropna:
input = input.dropna(0)
print("dropped nan rows")
'''
Data Splitting
'''
xTrain, xTest, yTrain, yTest = train_test_split(input,
targets,
test_size=testSetSize,
shuffle=False) #shuffle set to false to prevent temporal leakage
'''
5 fold CV splitting
'''
# in Liu et al., 2024: for each subject and session 5 models trained and assessed for each fold with shap values extracted
# hyperparamter tuning is also performed for each fold on the train/valid
indicesPerWindow = math.ceil(xTrain.shape[0] / 9)
indices = [i * indicesPerWindow for i in range(9 + 1)]
indices[-1] = xTrain.shape[0]
fold1XTrain = xTrain.iloc[indices[0]:indices[4], :]
fold1YTrain = yTrain.iloc[indices[0]:indices[4], :]
fold1XTest = xTrain.iloc[indices[4]:indices[5], :]
fold1YTest = yTrain.iloc[indices[4]:indices[5], :]
fold2XTrain = xTrain.iloc[indices[1]:indices[5], :]
fold2YTrain = yTrain.iloc[indices[1]:indices[5], :]
fold2XTest = xTrain.iloc[indices[5]:indices[6], :]
fold2YTest = yTrain.iloc[indices[5]:indices[6], :]
fold3XTrain = xTrain.iloc[indices[2]:indices[6], :]
fold3YTrain = yTrain.iloc[indices[2]:indices[6], :]
fold3XTest = xTrain.iloc[indices[6]:indices[7], :]
fold3YTest = yTrain.iloc[indices[6]:indices[7], :]
fold4XTrain = xTrain.iloc[indices[3]:indices[7], :]
fold4YTrain = yTrain.iloc[indices[3]:indices[7], :]
fold4XTest = xTrain.iloc[indices[7]:indices[8], :]
fold4YTest = yTrain.iloc[indices[7]:indices[8], :]
fold5XTrain = xTrain.iloc[indices[4]:indices[8], :]
fold5YTrain = yTrain.iloc[indices[4]:indices[8], :]
fold5XTest = xTrain.iloc[indices[8]:indices[9], :]
fold5YTest = yTrain.iloc[indices[8]:indices[9], :]
'''
Model Training
'''
# There exists more robust hyperparameter tuning methods (bayesian etc.) Grid search is just fine for our purposes.
paramGrid = {
'num_leaves': [3, 5, 13, 29],
'bagging_fraction': [ 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0],
'bagging_freq': [0, 4, 8, 12],
'feature_fraction': [0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0],
'learning_rate': numpy.logspace(-3, -1, 5),
}
combs = list(product(
paramGrid['num_leaves'],
paramGrid['bagging_fraction'],
paramGrid['bagging_freq'],
paramGrid['feature_fraction'],
paramGrid['learning_rate']
))
print("tuning hyperparameters")
bestParamsFold1, _ = gridcv.tuneLGBClassifierBinaryParameters(combs, fold1XTrain, fold1YTrain, fold1XTest, fold1YTest)
bestParamsFold2, _ = gridcv.tuneLGBClassifierBinaryParameters(combs, fold2XTrain, fold2YTrain, fold2XTest, fold2YTest)
bestParamsFold3, _ = gridcv.tuneLGBClassifierBinaryParameters(combs, fold3XTrain, fold3YTrain, fold3XTest, fold3YTest)
bestParamsFold4, _ = gridcv.tuneLGBClassifierBinaryParameters(combs, fold4XTrain, fold4YTrain, fold4XTest, fold4YTest)
bestParamsFold5, _ = gridcv.tuneLGBClassifierBinaryParameters(combs, fold5XTrain, fold5YTrain, fold5XTest, fold5YTest)
fold1GBMData = lightgbm.Dataset(fold1XTrain, label=fold1YTrain)
fold1Model = lightgbm.train(bestParamsFold1, fold1GBMData)
fold2GBMData = lightgbm.Dataset(fold2XTrain, label=fold2YTrain)
fold2Model = lightgbm.train(bestParamsFold2, fold2GBMData)
fold3GBMData = lightgbm.Dataset(fold3XTrain, label=fold3YTrain)
fold3Model = lightgbm.train(bestParamsFold3, fold3GBMData)
fold4GBMData = lightgbm.Dataset(fold4XTrain, label=fold4YTrain)
fold4Model = lightgbm.train(bestParamsFold4, fold4GBMData)
fold5GBMData = lightgbm.Dataset(fold5XTrain, label=fold5YTrain)
fold5Model = lightgbm.train(bestParamsFold5, fold5GBMData)
'''
Model testing
'''
fold1Preds = fold1Model.predict(fold1XTest)
fold2Preds = fold2Model.predict(fold2XTest)
fold3Preds = fold3Model.predict(fold3XTest)
fold4Preds = fold4Model.predict(fold4XTest)
fold5Preds = fold5Model.predict(fold5XTest)
'''
Model evaluation
'''
fold1PredLabels = (fold1Preds >= 0.5).astype(int)
fold2PredLabels = (fold2Preds >= 0.5).astype(int)
fold3PredLabels = (fold3Preds >= 0.5).astype(int)
fold4PredLabels = (fold4Preds >= 0.5).astype(int)
fold5PredLabels = (fold5Preds >= 0.5).astype(int)
foldAccuracy.at[0, 'Fold 1'] = accuracy_score(fold1YTest, fold1PredLabels)
foldAccuracy.at[0, 'Fold 2'] = accuracy_score(fold2YTest, fold2PredLabels)
foldAccuracy.at[0, 'Fold 3'] = accuracy_score(fold3YTest, fold3PredLabels)
foldAccuracy.at[0, 'Fold 4'] = accuracy_score(fold4YTest, fold4PredLabels)
foldAccuracy.at[0, 'Fold 5'] = accuracy_score(fold5YTest, fold5PredLabels)
foldPrecision.at[0, 'Fold 1'] = precision_score(fold1YTest, fold1PredLabels, zero_division=0)
foldPrecision.at[0, 'Fold 2'] = precision_score(fold2YTest, fold2PredLabels, zero_division=0)
foldPrecision.at[0, 'Fold 3'] = precision_score(fold3YTest, fold3PredLabels, zero_division=0)
foldPrecision.at[0, 'Fold 4'] = precision_score(fold4YTest, fold4PredLabels, zero_division=0)
foldPrecision.at[0, 'Fold 5'] = precision_score(fold5YTest, fold5PredLabels, zero_division=0)
foldRecall.at[0, 'Fold 1'] = recall_score(fold1YTest, fold1PredLabels, zero_division=0)
foldRecall.at[0, 'Fold 2'] = recall_score(fold2YTest, fold2PredLabels, zero_division=0)
foldRecall.at[0, 'Fold 3'] = recall_score(fold3YTest, fold3PredLabels, zero_division=0)
foldRecall.at[0, 'Fold 4'] = recall_score(fold4YTest, fold4PredLabels, zero_division=0)
foldRecall.at[0, 'Fold 5'] = recall_score(fold5YTest, fold5PredLabels, zero_division=0)
foldF1.at[0, 'Fold 1'] = f1_score(fold1YTest, fold1PredLabels, zero_division=0)
foldF1.at[0, 'Fold 2'] = f1_score(fold2YTest, fold2PredLabels, zero_division=0)
foldF1.at[0, 'Fold 3'] = f1_score(fold3YTest, fold3PredLabels, zero_division=0)
foldF1.at[0, 'Fold 4'] = f1_score(fold4YTest, fold4PredLabels, zero_division=0)
foldF1.at[0, 'Fold 5'] = f1_score(fold5YTest, fold5PredLabels, zero_division=0)
'''
Pull Shap values
'''
explainer1 = shap.TreeExplainer(fold1Model)
shapValues1 = explainer1(fold1XTest)
explainer2 = shap.TreeExplainer(fold2Model)
shapValues2 = explainer2(fold2XTest)
explainer3 = shap.TreeExplainer(fold3Model)
shapValues3 = explainer3(fold3XTest)
explainer4 = shap.TreeExplainer(fold4Model)
shapValues4 = explainer4(fold4XTest)
explainer5 = shap.TreeExplainer(fold5Model)
shapValues5 = explainer5(fold5XTest)
'''
IO
'''
shapValues1 = pandas.DataFrame(shapValues1.values, columns = fold1XTest.columns)
shapValues1.to_csv(os.path.join(savePath, f"{subject}_{session}_shapValuesFold1.csv"), index=False)
shapValues2 = pandas.DataFrame(shapValues2.values, columns = fold2XTest.columns)
shapValues2.to_csv(os.path.join(savePath, f"{subject}_{session}_shapValuesFold2.csv"), index=False)
shapValues3 = pandas.DataFrame(shapValues3.values, columns = fold3XTest.columns)
shapValues3.to_csv(os.path.join(savePath, f"{subject}_{session}_shapValuesFold3.csv"), index=False)
shapValues4 = pandas.DataFrame(shapValues4.values, columns = fold4XTest.columns)
shapValues4.to_csv(os.path.join(savePath, f"{subject}_{session}_shapValuesFold4.csv"), index=False)
shapValues5 = pandas.DataFrame(shapValues5.values, columns = fold5XTest.columns)
shapValues5.to_csv(os.path.join(savePath, f"{subject}_{session}_shapValuesFold5.csv"), index=False)
foldAccuracy.to_csv(os.path.join(savePath, f"{subject}_{session}_foldAccuracy.csv"), index=False)
foldPrecision.to_csv(os.path.join(savePath, f"{subject}_{session}_foldPrecision.csv"), index=False)
foldRecall.to_csv(os.path.join(savePath, f"{subject}_{session}_foldRecall.csv"), index=False)
foldF1.to_csv(os.path.join(savePath, f"{subject}_{session}_foldF1.csv"), index=False)
fold1Model.save_model(os.path.join(savePath, f"{subject}_{session}_fold1Model.txt"))
fold2Model.save_model(os.path.join(savePath, f"{subject}_{session}_fold2Model.txt"))
fold3Model.save_model(os.path.join(savePath, f"{subject}_{session}_fold3Model.txt"))
fold4Model.save_model(os.path.join(savePath, f"{subject}_{session}_fold4Model.txt"))
fold5Model.save_model(os.path.join(savePath, f"{subject}_{session}_fold5Model.txt"))
'''
Evaluate on holdout set
Have to look at fold results and pick best model params
'''
holdoutParams = bestParamsFold3 # change this
holdoutGBMData = lightgbm.Dataset(xTrain, label=yTrain)
holdoutModel = lightgbm.train(holdoutParams, holdoutGBMData)
holdoutPreds = holdoutModel.predict(xTest)
holdoutPredLabels = (holdoutPreds >= 0.5).astype(int)
holdoutAccuracy = accuracy_score(yTest, holdoutPredLabels)
holdoutPrecision = precision_score(yTest, holdoutPredLabels)
holdoutRecall = recall_score(yTest, holdoutPredLabels)
holdoutF1 = f1_score(yTest, holdoutPredLabels)