Tokenization breaks on list used as default parameter

[alexr00]

Originally from @matkoniecz in microsoft/vscode#104423

Issue Type: Bug

module CartoCSSHelper
  def self.test_tag_on_real_data(tags, new_branch, old_branch, zlevels, types = ['node', 'closed_way', 'way'], min = 4, skip = 0)
    types.each do |type|
      test_tag_on_real_data_for_this_type(tags, new_branch, old_branch, zlevels, type, min, skip)
    end
  end
end

It is a valid syntax that will confuse code highlighting

VS Code version: VSCodium 1.47.3 (91899dcef7b8110878ea59626991a18c8a6a1b3e, 2020-07-28T10:50:43.978Z)
OS version: Linux x64 5.4.0-42-generic

System Info

Item	Value
CPUs	Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T6600 @ 2.20GHz (2 x 2194)
GPU Status	2d_canvas: enabled flash_3d: enabled flash_stage3d: enabled flash_stage3d_baseline: enabled gpu_compositing: enabled multiple_raster_threads: disabled_off oop_rasterization: disabled_off protected_video_decode: unavailable_off rasterization: disabled_software skia_renderer: disabled_off_ok video_decode: unavailable_off viz_display_compositor: enabled_on viz_hit_test_surface_layer: disabled_off_ok webgl: enabled webgl2: enabled
Load (avg)	2, 2, 2
Memory (System)	3.81GB (0.11GB free)
Process Argv	--no-sandbox --unity-launch /home/mateusz/Documents/install_moje/OSM software/bicycle_osm/clearing_cache_run_znajdywanie_celów.sh
Screen Reader	no
VM	0%
DESKTOP_SESSION	Lubuntu
XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP	LXQt
XDG_SESSION_DESKTOP
XDG_SESSION_TYPE	x11

Extensions (3)

Extension	Author (truncated)	Version
kotlin	fwc	0.2.14
csharp	ms-	1.22.1
vscode-unitymeta	PTD	0.0.7

[graceful-potato]

I think I know how to fix it. And I have found another "bug" for method definition without parentheses. This kind of method definition does not support multiline arguments.

I could try to make a pr with fixes for these bugs.

[matkoniecz]

I would really be happy if you would manage to make PR fix for that problem?

method definition without parentheses - is it actually a valid ruby syntax?

[graceful-potato]

method definition without parentheses - is it actually a valid ruby syntax?

yes, it is valid syntax

[graceful-potato]

I apologize for taking so long, my first idea of ​​how to solve it did not fully work, and then I completely forgot about this issue.
I am not very happy about this approach but looks like it works #136