While Restic has a weak documentation (https://restic.readthedocs.io/en/stable/index.html), which makes very hard to get what the features are at first, or what are the commands it provides, it seems very similar to Borg.
> https://blog.stickleback.dk/borg-or-restic/
(https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/Backups_v3)
Metadata support, especially for Windows, seems lighter. But without repo lock it seems more reliable to share repo between servers.
Note to self, possible model:
- shared repo for server's system files (more dedup)
- eventually shared repo for logs
- shared repo for content files & stdin sqldumps
But the same principle could be used:
Unix socket maybe possible using -o sftp.command="foobar", but requiring additional socat on both client&server.
Maybe this already exists?
While Restic has a weak documentation (https://restic.readthedocs.io/en/stable/index.html), which makes very hard to get what the features are at first, or what are the commands it provides, it seems very similar to Borg.
> https://blog.stickleback.dk/borg-or-restic/
(https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/Backups_v3)
Metadata support, especially for Windows, seems lighter. But without repo lock it seems more reliable to share repo between servers.
But the same principle could be used:
Unix socket maybe possible using
-o sftp.command="foobar", but requiring additionalsocaton both client&server.Maybe this already exists?