#253 removed the rb and rtc sub elements of ruby, because they are been marked obsolete in the HTML specification. https://www.w3.org/TR/html-ruby-extensions/ is restoring them, and so they should be restored in accessibility mappings as well.
(See the introduction and appendix B for rationale.)
In terms of roles, I believe the following ones would be correct:
This blocks w3c/html-ruby#45
#253 removed the
rbandrtcsub elements of ruby, because they are been marked obsolete in the HTML specification. https://www.w3.org/TR/html-ruby-extensions/ is restoring them, and so they should be restored in accessibility mappings as well.(See the introduction and appendix B for rationale.)
In terms of roles, I believe the following ones would be correct:
for
rbfor
rtc: it's container forrtelements, and occasionally anonymous text nodes with the same semantics as rt, so probably the same roles asrtwould seem to make sense.This blocks w3c/html-ruby#45