Skip to content

Example defining the details of a Process #4

@rokroskar

Description

@rokroskar

The wfdesc spec for http://purl.org/wf4ever/wfdesc#Process states that

It is out of scope for wfdesc to classify or specify the nature of the process, this should be done by subclassing and additional subproperties

Is there an example of how this is envisioned to look? I'm surprised there are only input and output properties defined but nothing about the process itself. Which ontologies should be used to further specify Process? For example, I would like to express the command that was run and its arguments.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions