Skip to content

Use left join for DE Spearman/AUC (Fixes #227)#228

Merged
noamteyssier merged 1 commit intoArcInstitute:cell-eval-0.7.0from
beabevi:fix-de-metrics-left-join
Mar 19, 2026
Merged

Use left join for DE Spearman/AUC (Fixes #227)#228
noamteyssier merged 1 commit intoArcInstitute:cell-eval-0.7.0from
beabevi:fix-de-metrics-left-join

Conversation

@beabevi
Copy link

@beabevi beabevi commented Mar 5, 2026

Summary

  • Compute DE Spearman LFC on real significant genes by left-joining pred DE and filling missing pred fold-change with 0.0.
  • Compute PR/ROC AUC on all real-labeled genes by left-joining pred scores, filling missing pred_fdr with 1.0, and clipping to [1e-10, 1.0] before -log10.

Why

Current inner joins restrict metrics to the intersection of pred/real DE tables, which contradicts intended semantics. This PR aligns metrics with the real-DE / all-genes definitions.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the computation of differential expression (DE) Spearman and AUC metrics. By transitioning from inner joins to left joins and implementing robust handling for missing predicted values, the changes ensure that these metrics accurately reflect the intended semantics, considering all relevant real-labeled or significant genes rather than just the intersection of predicted and real data.

Highlights

  • Spearman LFC Calculation: Modified the Spearman LFC calculation to use a left join instead of an inner join when merging real significant genes with predicted data. Missing predicted fold-change values are now filled with 0.0, ensuring that all real significant genes are considered.
  • AUC Calculation: Updated the AUC calculation to use a left join when merging real-labeled genes with predicted data. Missing predicted FDR values are now filled with 1.0 and clipped to the range [1e-10, 1.0] before applying the -log10 transformation, aligning the metric with the definition for all real-labeled genes.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • src/cell_eval/metrics/_de.py
    • Changed the join type from 'inner' to 'left' for Spearman LFC calculation.
    • Added a step to fill null predicted fold-change values with 0.0 in Spearman LFC.
    • Changed the join type from 'inner' to 'left' for AUC calculation.
    • Added logic to fill null predicted FDR values with 1.0 and clip them to [1e-10, 1.0] before log transformation in AUC calculation.
Activity
  • No human activity has been recorded on this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly changes the join strategy from inner to left for calculating Spearman correlation and AUC metrics. This ensures that all relevant genes from the ground truth data are considered, providing more accurate metric calculations. The changes in DESpearmanLFC and compute_generic_auc are logical and well-implemented. I have one minor suggestion to improve code clarity in compute_generic_auc.

Comment on lines +240 to +243
.with_columns(
pred_q.alias(pred_fdr_col),
(-pred_q.log10()).alias("nlp"),
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The update to pred_fdr_col via pred_q.alias(pred_fdr_col) is not necessary, as this column isn't used again within the function. You can simplify this with_columns call by only creating the nlp column.

        .with_columns(
            (-pred_q.log10()).alias("nlp")
        )

@noamteyssier noamteyssier merged commit b923274 into ArcInstitute:cell-eval-0.7.0 Mar 19, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants