Skip to content

feat: add skill-creator casedev skill#49

Open
maxsonderby wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
max/skill-creator
Open

feat: add skill-creator casedev skill#49
maxsonderby wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
max/skill-creator

Conversation

@maxsonderby

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds skills/casedev/skill-creator — the authoritative procedure agents follow when a user asks to create a reusable skill from chat (C3's Create with AI flow points at it via skill_read skill-creator).

Covers: interview → draft (pushy/triggery summary per skill-authoring best practices, agent-directed content) → explicit user approval → creation as a private org skill via casedev api POST /skills (JSON-file pattern to avoid shell quoting) → plain-language confirmation. Includes update path (PUT /skills/<slug>), credential rules, and troubleshooting (slug conflict, auth failure, content cap).

Verified the CLI surface: casedev api <method> <path> --body is the raw-call form available in the pre-authenticated Linc sandbox (native skill tools are read-only).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The authoritative procedure for creating private org skills from a Linc
chat: interview, draft (triggery summary, agent-directed content),
approve, then create via 'casedev api POST /skills'. C3's Create with AI
quick action points agents at this skill (skill_read skill-creator).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@thurgood-bot

thurgood-bot Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Oppenheimer Cleanup Review

No provable dead code, redundancy, or over-engineering in the new skill file; no safe simplifications identified without behavior risk.

No cleanup opportunities found. This code is already lean.


Cleanup review by Oppenheimer | Re-run with /cleanup

@thurgood-bot

thurgood-bot Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Judicial Review

Adds a new skill definition that documents the workflow for creating private org skills via the casedev CLI. No security, data integrity, or architectural issues identified in the content as written.

No significant issues found. This code is cleared to ship.


Legal-Grade review by Thurgood | Re-review with /review

@thurgood-bot

thurgood-bot Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

DB Cooper Database Review

DB review: no database schema, migration, or query changes in this PR. No DB risks detected.

No database risks found. Migrations and DB-impacting changes look safe.


DB review by DB Cooper | Re-run with /dbreview

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant