delete-resource-entity-project #329
Conversation
VISHNUDAS-tunerlabs
left a comment
VISHNUDAS-tunerlabs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved on Jul28 3:30
WalkthroughNew administrative POST routes for deleting entities and resources were added to the route configuration files for the entity, project, and survey services. Additional routes were included for program component solution removal and user course creation/updating. A package version was incremented in the survey observation package. No existing routes were altered. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Admin
participant Gateway
participant Service
Admin->>Gateway: POST /{entity,project,survey}/v1/admin/delete(Resource|Entity)[/:id]
Gateway->>Service: Forward request to target service (entity/project/survey)
Service-->>Gateway: Respond with deletion result
Gateway-->>Admin: Return response
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
elevate-project/package.json (1)
3-3: Confirm the1.1.43tag before publishing
Same concern raised earlier – double-check the registry or release pipeline to ensure this exact version is the next one available.interface-routes/elevate-dev-routes.json (1)
12449-12475: Same GET/POST concern applies to survey endpointsFor consistency with the project routes (see previous comment) the survey “deletedResourceDetails” endpoints should also be
GET.
Update both the/:idand non-/:identries.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
interface-routes/elevate-dev-routes.json (1)
12407-12419: Duplicate route without:idmight be redundantYou now expose:
/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity/:id/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity(body-driven)Unless there is a clear business need to support both path-param and body-param approaches, consider keeping only one variant to minimise surface area and API inconsistency.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
elevate-project/constants/routes.js(1 hunks)elevate-project/package.json(1 hunks)elevate-survey/constants/routes.js(1 hunks)elevate-survey/package.json(1 hunks)interface-routes/elevate-dev-routes.json(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
elevate-survey/package.json (1)
3-3: Version bump acknowledged
1.0.17is fine as long as this package is published in lock-step with the interface-route changes.interface-routes/elevate-dev-routes.json (1)
12392-12406: VerifybasePackageName→ project looks mismatched for an “entity-management” routeBoth new
/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity…entries route traffic toelevate-projectwithbasePackageName: "project", while"service"is set to"entity".
If the delete-entity implementation actually lives inside the “entity” service (or anelevate-entitypackage, as older routes normally do), this mapping will silently forward the call to the wrong micro-service.- "basePackageName": "project", + "basePackageName": "entity",Please cross-check the existing route catalogue before merging.
| { | ||
| sourceRoute: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity", | ||
| type: "POST", | ||
| inSequence: false, | ||
| targetRoute: { | ||
| path: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity", | ||
| type: "POST" | ||
| }, | ||
| service: "entity" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing orchestrated property and fix indentation.
The route configuration is missing the orchestrated property that is present in all other routes in this file. Additionally, the indentation uses tabs instead of spaces, which is inconsistent with the rest of the file.
Apply this diff to fix the consistency issues:
- {
- sourceRoute: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity",
- type: "POST",
- inSequence: false,
- targetRoute: {
- path: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity",
- type: "POST"
- },
- service: "entity"
- },
+ {
+ sourceRoute: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity",
+ type: "POST",
+ inSequence: false,
+ orchestrated: false,
+ targetRoute: {
+ path: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity",
+ type: "POST"
+ },
+ service: "entity"
+ },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| { | |
| sourceRoute: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity", | |
| type: "POST", | |
| inSequence: false, | |
| targetRoute: { | |
| path: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity", | |
| type: "POST" | |
| }, | |
| service: "entity" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| sourceRoute: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity", | |
| type: "POST", | |
| inSequence: false, | |
| orchestrated: false, | |
| targetRoute: { | |
| path: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity", | |
| type: "POST" | |
| }, | |
| service: "entity" | |
| }, |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In elevate-project/constants/routes.js around lines 3096 to 3105, the route
configuration is missing the `orchestrated` property that should be included for
consistency with other routes. Add the `orchestrated` property with the
appropriate boolean value (likely true or false based on similar routes). Also,
replace all tab characters with spaces to fix the indentation and match the
file's formatting style.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
orchestrated is not complusary for all the end point
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
@MallanagoudaB You are absolutely correct! After analyzing the file, I can see that the orchestrated property is indeed not compulsory for all endpoints. Many routes in the file don't include this property at all, particularly some of the user service routes.
The indentation inconsistency (tabs vs spaces) is still worth addressing for consistency, but you're right that the orchestrated property is optional.
Thank you for the clarification!
/| /|
( :v: )
|(_)|
^ ^
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Analyze the orchestrated property usage in the routes file
echo "Checking routes with and without orchestrated property:"
echo ""
# Count total routes
total_routes=$(grep -c "sourceRoute:" elevate-project/constants/routes.js)
echo "Total routes found: $total_routes"
# Count routes with orchestrated property
routes_with_orchestrated=$(grep -c "orchestrated:" elevate-project/constants/routes.js)
echo "Routes with orchestrated property: $routes_with_orchestrated"
# Count routes without orchestrated property
routes_without_orchestrated=$((total_routes - routes_with_orchestrated))
echo "Routes without orchestrated property: $routes_without_orchestrated"
echo ""
echo "Examples of routes WITHOUT orchestrated property:"
grep -A 10 -B 2 "sourceRoute.*user.*form.*read" elevate-project/constants/routes.js | head -15
echo ""
echo "Examples of routes WITH orchestrated property:"
grep -A 10 -B 2 "orchestrated.*false" elevate-project/constants/routes.js | head -15
Length of output: 1834
@MallanagoudaB You are absolutely correct! The script results confirm your statement:
- Total routes: 293
- Routes with orchestrated property: 260
- Routes without orchestrated property: 33
This clearly shows that about 11% of the routes don't include the orchestrated property, making it optional rather than compulsory. I apologize for the incorrect assumption in my review.
The only remaining consistency issue would be the indentation (tabs vs spaces), but you're completely right about the orchestrated property being optional.
Thank you for the correction!
/| /|
( :v: )
|(_)|
^ ^
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
PR: ELEVATE-Project/utils#329
File: elevate-project/constants/routes.js:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T09:46:50.047Z
Learning: In the elevate-project/constants/routes.js file, the `orchestrated` property is not compulsory for all route configurations. Many routes exist without this property, making it optional rather than required.
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
PR: ELEVATE-Project/utils#329
File: elevate-project/constants/routes.js:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T09:46:50.047Z
Learning: In the elevate-project/constants/routes.js file, the `orchestrated` property is not compulsory for all route configurations. Out of 293 total routes, 33 routes (about 11%) exist without this property, making it optional rather than required.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
| { | ||
| sourceRoute: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity/:id", | ||
| type: "POST", | ||
| inSequence: false, | ||
| targetRoute: { | ||
| path: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity/:id", | ||
| type: "POST" | ||
| }, | ||
| service: "entity" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing orchestrated property and fix indentation.
Similar to the previous route, this configuration is missing the orchestrated property and uses inconsistent indentation.
Apply this diff to fix the consistency issues:
- {
- sourceRoute: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity/:id",
- type: "POST",
- inSequence: false,
- targetRoute: {
- path: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity/:id",
- type: "POST"
- },
- service: "entity"
- },
+ {
+ sourceRoute: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity/:id",
+ type: "POST",
+ inSequence: false,
+ orchestrated: false,
+ targetRoute: {
+ path: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity/:id",
+ type: "POST"
+ },
+ service: "entity"
+ },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| { | |
| sourceRoute: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity/:id", | |
| type: "POST", | |
| inSequence: false, | |
| targetRoute: { | |
| path: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity/:id", | |
| type: "POST" | |
| }, | |
| service: "entity" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| sourceRoute: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity/:id", | |
| type: "POST", | |
| inSequence: false, | |
| orchestrated: false, | |
| targetRoute: { | |
| path: "/entity-management/v1/admin/deleteEntity/:id", | |
| type: "POST" | |
| }, | |
| service: "entity" | |
| }, |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In elevate-project/constants/routes.js around lines 3106 to 3115, the route
configuration is missing the required 'orchestrated' property and has
inconsistent indentation. Add the 'orchestrated' property with the appropriate
boolean value (likely false to match similar routes) and adjust the indentation
to align with the surrounding route objects for consistency.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
orchestrated is not complusary for all the end point
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@MallanagoudaB Thank you for the clarification! You're absolutely right that the orchestrated property is not compulsory for all endpoints.
I can see from the codebase that there's a mixed pattern where some routes explicitly set orchestrated: false while others omit the property entirely, and it appears both approaches are valid depending on the route's requirements.
I appreciate you pointing this out - it helps me understand the route configuration patterns better for future reviews.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
PR: ELEVATE-Project/utils#329
File: elevate-project/constants/routes.js:3128-3137
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T09:46:00.206Z
Learning: In route configurations for the ELEVATE project, the `orchestrated` property is not mandatory for all endpoints. Some routes explicitly set `orchestrated: false`, some omit the property entirely, and some set it to `true` (typically when `inSequence: true` is also set for interface routes). The presence or absence of the `orchestrated` property depends on the specific requirements of each route.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
| { | ||
| sourceRoute: "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails", | ||
| type: "POST", | ||
| inSequence: false, | ||
| targetRoute: { | ||
| path: "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails", | ||
| type: "POST" | ||
| }, | ||
| service: "project" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing orchestrated property.
The route configuration is missing the orchestrated property that is present in all other routes in this file.
Apply this diff to add the missing property:
{
sourceRoute: "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails",
type: "POST",
inSequence: false,
+ orchestrated: false,
targetRoute: {
path: "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails",
type: "POST"
},
service: "project"
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| { | |
| sourceRoute: "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails", | |
| type: "POST", | |
| inSequence: false, | |
| targetRoute: { | |
| path: "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails", | |
| type: "POST" | |
| }, | |
| service: "project" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| sourceRoute: "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails", | |
| type: "POST", | |
| inSequence: false, | |
| orchestrated: false, | |
| targetRoute: { | |
| path: "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails", | |
| type: "POST" | |
| }, | |
| service: "project" | |
| }, |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In elevate-project/constants/routes.js around lines 3116 to 3125, the route
configuration is missing the required 'orchestrated' property that is
consistently present in other route objects. Add the 'orchestrated' property
with the appropriate boolean value (true or false as per the convention in this
file) to this route configuration to maintain consistency and correctness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
orchestrated is not complusary for all the end point
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@MallanagoudaB Thank you for the clarification! You're absolutely right. Looking at the existing routes in the file, I can see that the orchestrated property is indeed optional and not present on all endpoints. I apologize for the incorrect suggestion.
🐰
∩ ∩
( .. )
o(")(")
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
PR: ELEVATE-Project/utils#329
File: elevate-project/constants/routes.js:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T09:46:07.292Z
Learning: In route configuration files like elevate-project/constants/routes.js, the `orchestrated` property is optional and not required for all endpoints. Some routes have `orchestrated: false` while others omit this property entirely.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
| { | ||
| sourceRoute: "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id", | ||
| type: "POST", | ||
| inSequence: false, | ||
| targetRoute: { | ||
| path: "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id", | ||
| type: "POST" | ||
| }, | ||
| service: "project" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing orchestrated property.
The route configuration is missing the orchestrated property that is present in all other routes in this file.
Apply this diff to add the missing property:
{
sourceRoute: "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id",
type: "POST",
inSequence: false,
+ orchestrated: false,
targetRoute: {
path: "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id",
type: "POST"
},
service: "project"
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| { | |
| sourceRoute: "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id", | |
| type: "POST", | |
| inSequence: false, | |
| targetRoute: { | |
| path: "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id", | |
| type: "POST" | |
| }, | |
| service: "project" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| sourceRoute: "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id", | |
| type: "POST", | |
| inSequence: false, | |
| orchestrated: false, | |
| targetRoute: { | |
| path: "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id", | |
| type: "POST" | |
| }, | |
| service: "project" | |
| }, |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In elevate-project/constants/routes.js around lines 3126 to 3135, the route
configuration is missing the `orchestrated` property that is consistently
present in other route objects. Add the `orchestrated` property with the
appropriate boolean value (usually true or false as per the file's convention)
to this route configuration to maintain consistency and correctness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
orchestrated is not complusary for all the end point
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@MallanagoudaB Thank you for the clarification! You're absolutely right - I can see now that many routes in the file don't include the orchestrated property, and it's not a required field for all endpoints. I appreciate you correcting my assessment.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
PR: ELEVATE-Project/utils#329
File: elevate-project/constants/routes.js:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T09:46:09.378Z
Learning: The `orchestrated` property is not compulsory for all endpoints in route configuration files. Some routes may omit this property entirely, while others explicitly set it to true or false based on their specific requirements.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
elevate-survey/constants/routes.js
Outdated
| sourceRoute: "/survey/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails", | ||
| type: "POST", | ||
| inSequence: false, | ||
| targetRoute: { | ||
| path: "/survey/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails", | ||
| type: "POST" | ||
| }, | ||
| service: "survey" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| sourceRoute: "/survey/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id", | ||
| type: "POST", | ||
| inSequence: false, | ||
| targetRoute: { | ||
| path: "/survey/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id", | ||
| type: "POST" | ||
| }, | ||
| service: "survey" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing orchestrated property & trailing-comma style in the two new admin routes
All other route objects carry the field orchestrated: false. Omitting it here may break runtime schema validation or downstream expectations.
Add the flag (and keep comma style consistent):
sourceRoute: "/survey/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails",
type: "POST",
inSequence: false,
+ orchestrated: false,
targetRoute: {
path: "/survey/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails",
type: "POST"
},
service: "survey"
- },
+ },
@@
sourceRoute: "/survey/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id",
type: "POST",
inSequence: false,
+ orchestrated: false,
targetRoute: {
path: "/survey/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id",
type: "POST"
},
service: "survey"
- },
+ },Without this, any code assuming a uniform route shape will either crash or silently treat these routes as orchestrated, altering request flow.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| sourceRoute: "/survey/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails", | |
| type: "POST", | |
| inSequence: false, | |
| targetRoute: { | |
| path: "/survey/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails", | |
| type: "POST" | |
| }, | |
| service: "survey" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| sourceRoute: "/survey/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id", | |
| type: "POST", | |
| inSequence: false, | |
| targetRoute: { | |
| path: "/survey/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id", | |
| type: "POST" | |
| }, | |
| service: "survey" | |
| }, | |
| sourceRoute: "/survey/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails", | |
| type: "POST", | |
| inSequence: false, | |
| orchestrated: false, | |
| targetRoute: { | |
| path: "/survey/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails", | |
| type: "POST" | |
| }, | |
| service: "survey" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| sourceRoute: "/survey/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id", | |
| type: "POST", | |
| inSequence: false, | |
| orchestrated: false, | |
| targetRoute: { | |
| path: "/survey/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id", | |
| type: "POST" | |
| }, | |
| service: "survey" | |
| }, |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In elevate-survey/constants/routes.js around lines 2971 to 2989, the two new
admin route objects are missing the `orchestrated: false` property present in
other route objects, which may cause runtime schema validation failures or
unexpected behavior. Add `orchestrated: false` to both route objects and ensure
the trailing commas match the existing style for consistency.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
orchestrated is not complusary for all the end point
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@MallanagoudaB You're absolutely right! Based on the retrieved learning from our knowledge base, the orchestrated property is indeed not mandatory for all endpoints in the ELEVATE project route configurations.
The route configuration follows a flexible pattern where:
- Some routes explicitly set
orchestrated: false - Some routes omit the property entirely
- Some routes set
orchestrated: true(typically wheninSequence: truefor interface routes)
The two new admin routes you've added are correctly configured by omitting the orchestrated property, which is consistent with the project's routing patterns. My previous suggestion was based on an incorrect assumption. Thank you for the clarification!
🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
PR: ELEVATE-Project/utils#329
File: elevate-project/constants/routes.js:3128-3137
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T09:46:00.206Z
Learning: In route configurations for the ELEVATE project, the `orchestrated` property is not mandatory for all endpoints. Some routes explicitly set `orchestrated: false`, some omit the property entirely, and some set it to `true` (typically when `inSequence: true` is also set for interface routes). The presence or absence of the `orchestrated` property depends on the specific requirements of each route.
| "sourceRoute": "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id", | ||
| "type": "POST", | ||
| "priority": "MUST_HAVE", | ||
| "inSequence": false, | ||
| "orchestrated": false, | ||
| "targetPackages": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "basePackageName": "project", | ||
| "packageName": "elevate-project" | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "service": "project" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "sourceRoute": "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails", | ||
| "type": "POST", | ||
| "priority": "MUST_HAVE", | ||
| "inSequence": false, | ||
| "orchestrated": false, | ||
| "targetPackages": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "basePackageName": "project", | ||
| "packageName": "elevate-project" | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "service": "project" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use GET instead of POST for read-only “deletedResourceDetails” endpoints
Fetching details is an idempotent, side-effect-free operation, yet the route is registered with "type": "POST".
Sticking to HTTP semantics improves cacheability, observability and aligns with existing tooling.
- "type": "POST",
+ "type": "GET",Please apply the same change to the non-:id variant below.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "sourceRoute": "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id", | |
| "type": "POST", | |
| "priority": "MUST_HAVE", | |
| "inSequence": false, | |
| "orchestrated": false, | |
| "targetPackages": [ | |
| { | |
| "basePackageName": "project", | |
| "packageName": "elevate-project" | |
| } | |
| ], | |
| "service": "project" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "sourceRoute": "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails", | |
| "type": "POST", | |
| "priority": "MUST_HAVE", | |
| "inSequence": false, | |
| "orchestrated": false, | |
| "targetPackages": [ | |
| { | |
| "basePackageName": "project", | |
| "packageName": "elevate-project" | |
| } | |
| ], | |
| "service": "project" | |
| }, | |
| "sourceRoute": "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails/:id", | |
| - "type": "POST", | |
| + "type": "GET", | |
| "priority": "MUST_HAVE", | |
| "inSequence": false, | |
| "orchestrated": false, | |
| "targetPackages": [ | |
| { | |
| "basePackageName": "project", | |
| "packageName": "elevate-project" | |
| } | |
| ], | |
| "service": "project" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "sourceRoute": "/project/v1/admin/deletedResourceDetails", | |
| - "type": "POST", | |
| + "type": "GET", | |
| "priority": "MUST_HAVE", | |
| "inSequence": false, | |
| "orchestrated": false, | |
| "targetPackages": [ | |
| { | |
| "basePackageName": "project", | |
| "packageName": "elevate-project" | |
| } | |
| ], | |
| "service": "project" | |
| }, |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In interface-routes/elevate-dev-routes.json around lines 12421 to 12447, the
HTTP method for the read-only endpoints "deletedResourceDetails/:id" and
"deletedResourceDetails" is incorrectly set to "POST". Change the "type" field
from "POST" to "GET" for both routes to correctly reflect their idempotent,
side-effect-free nature and improve cacheability and observability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it has to be POST
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@MallanagoudaB, understood! I'll defer to your knowledge of the system requirements. Thank you for the clarification.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
PR: ELEVATE-Project/utils#329
File: interface-routes/elevate-dev-routes.json:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T09:46:57.341Z
Learning: In the ELEVATE project, "deletedResourceDetails" endpoints use POST method instead of GET, even though they appear to be read-only operations. This is by design based on project-specific requirements.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
PR: ELEVATE-Project/utils#329
File: elevate-project/constants/routes.js:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T09:46:07.292Z
Learning: In route configuration files like elevate-project/constants/routes.js, the `orchestrated` property is optional and not required for all endpoints. Some routes have `orchestrated: false` while others omit this property entirely.
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
PR: ELEVATE-Project/utils#329
File: elevate-project/constants/routes.js:3128-3137
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T09:46:00.206Z
Learning: In route configurations for the ELEVATE project, the `orchestrated` property is not mandatory for all endpoints. Some routes explicitly set `orchestrated: false`, some omit the property entirely, and some set it to `true` (typically when `inSequence: true` is also set for interface routes). The presence or absence of the `orchestrated` property depends on the specific requirements of each route.
VISHNUDAS-tunerlabs
left a comment
VISHNUDAS-tunerlabs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed on Aug 4 12:56
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores