Skip to content

Conversation

@Prajwal17Tunerlabs
Copy link
Collaborator

@Prajwal17Tunerlabs Prajwal17Tunerlabs commented Dec 8, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Added new endpoints for updating project access control settings.
  • Chores

    • Version bumped to 1.1.53.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Walkthrough

Two new POST routes for ACL updates on user projects are added to the routing configuration, along with a version increment from 1.1.52 to 1.1.53 in the package manifest.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Route Additions
elevate-project/constants/routes.js
Added two new POST routes: /project/v1/userProjects/updateAcl and /project/v1/userProjects/updateAcl/:id, both mapped to the "project" service with inSequence: false and orchestrated: false.
Package Version
elevate-project/package.json
Updated version from "1.1.52" to "1.1.53".

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Simple route configuration additions with no complex logic
  • Straightforward version bump

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • VISHNUDAS-tunerlabs

Poem

🐰 Routes now flow with ACL delight,
New endpoints spring forth, clean and right,
Version bumped up, small but sure,
The project marches on, demure!
Hop, hop, hop—ready to explore! 🎯

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The title is too vague and does not accurately reflect the actual changes. The PR adds two new API route endpoints for ACL updates, but the title only mentions a package version bump. Update the title to reflect both main changes, such as: 'Add userProjects ACL update endpoints and bump version to 1.1.53' or focus on the primary change if one is intended.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/npm-pkg-changes

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1d6f4a and 4cf8ac5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • elevate-project/constants/routes.js (1 hunks)
  • elevate-project/package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (6)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
Repo: ELEVATE-Project/utils PR: 342
File: health-check/services/kafka.js:49-54
Timestamp: 2025-08-20T10:33:46.359Z
Learning: In the ELEVATE-Project/utils health-check module, when updating function signatures to add new parameters, both the service file and the parent file (health-check/index.js) that calls the function need to be updated to pass all required parameters.
📚 Learning: 2025-08-05T09:46:50.071Z
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
Repo: ELEVATE-Project/utils PR: 329
File: elevate-project/constants/routes.js:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T09:46:50.071Z
Learning: In the elevate-project/constants/routes.js file, the `orchestrated` property is not compulsory for all route configurations. Many routes exist without this property, making it optional rather than required.

Applied to files:

  • elevate-project/constants/routes.js
📚 Learning: 2025-08-05T09:46:50.071Z
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
Repo: ELEVATE-Project/utils PR: 329
File: elevate-project/constants/routes.js:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T09:46:50.071Z
Learning: In the elevate-project/constants/routes.js file, the `orchestrated` property is not compulsory for all route configurations. Out of 293 total routes, 33 routes (about 11%) exist without this property, making it optional rather than required.

Applied to files:

  • elevate-project/constants/routes.js
📚 Learning: 2025-08-05T09:46:07.320Z
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
Repo: ELEVATE-Project/utils PR: 329
File: elevate-project/constants/routes.js:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T09:46:07.320Z
Learning: In route configuration files like elevate-project/constants/routes.js, the `orchestrated` property is optional and not required for all endpoints. Some routes have `orchestrated: false` while others omit this property entirely.

Applied to files:

  • elevate-project/constants/routes.js
📚 Learning: 2025-08-20T10:33:46.359Z
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
Repo: ELEVATE-Project/utils PR: 342
File: health-check/services/kafka.js:49-54
Timestamp: 2025-08-20T10:33:46.359Z
Learning: In the ELEVATE-Project/utils health-check module, when updating function signatures to add new parameters, both the service file and the parent file (health-check/index.js) that calls the function need to be updated to pass all required parameters.

Applied to files:

  • elevate-project/constants/routes.js
📚 Learning: 2025-08-05T09:46:00.231Z
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
Repo: ELEVATE-Project/utils PR: 329
File: elevate-project/constants/routes.js:3128-3137
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T09:46:00.231Z
Learning: In route configurations for the ELEVATE project, the `orchestrated` property is not mandatory for all endpoints. Some routes explicitly set `orchestrated: false`, some omit the property entirely, and some set it to `true` (typically when `inSequence: true` is also set for interface routes). The presence or absence of the `orchestrated` property depends on the specific requirements of each route.

Applied to files:

  • elevate-project/constants/routes.js
🔇 Additional comments (3)
elevate-project/package.json (1)

3-3: LGTM! Appropriate version increment.

The patch version bump from 1.1.52 to 1.1.53 is correct for adding new ACL update routes, which represents a backward-compatible change.

elevate-project/constants/routes.js (2)

3351-3361: LGTM! Route configuration is consistent.

The new route for updating ACL on user projects follows the established pattern in the routing configuration. The structure, properties, and service mapping are all correct.


3362-3372: LGTM! Parameterized route correctly configured.

The parameterized version of the ACL update route is properly configured with the :id parameter. The pairing of both routes (with and without :id) follows the consistent pattern used throughout this routing configuration.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Collaborator

@VISHNUDAS-tunerlabs VISHNUDAS-tunerlabs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reviewed on dec 9

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants