Skip to content

feat(cabr): add SQLite persistence for consensus audit trails#580

Merged
Foundup merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/cabr-consensus-sqlite-audit
May 13, 2026
Merged

feat(cabr): add SQLite persistence for consensus audit trails#580
Foundup merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/cabr-consensus-sqlite-audit

Conversation

@Foundup
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Foundup Foundup commented May 13, 2026

Summary

  • Local SQLite storage for CABRConsensusRecord audit trails
  • CABRConsensusStore with initialize_schema/save/get/list/exists
  • Immutable append-only rows keyed by deterministic record_id/hash
  • Duplicate record_id handled idempotently (ALREADY_EXISTS)
  • WAL journal mode, caller-provided DB path
  • Fail-closed on schema/write errors

WSP 97 Compliance

  • Persistence is evidence storage only
  • Truth fields stored exactly as provided (all False)
  • No automatic state progression
  • No payout/DAO activation fields

Test plan

  • 35 tests covering store operations
  • 166 total tests passing with finalizer/quorum/scoring regression
  • Round-trip preserves record_hash

Slice: CABR_CONSENSUS_FINALIZATION_PHASE2_SQLITE_AUDIT_TRAIL
Worker: W10

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Local SQLite storage for CABRConsensusRecord audit trails:
- CABRConsensusStore with initialize_schema/save/get/list/exists
- Immutable append-only rows keyed by deterministic record_id/hash
- Duplicate record_id handled idempotently (ALREADY_EXISTS)
- WAL journal mode, caller-provided DB path
- Fail-closed on schema/write errors

35 tests + 131 regression = 166 total tests passing.

WSP 97: Persistence is evidence storage only.
Truth fields stored exactly as provided (all False).
No automatic state progression, no payout/DAO fields.

Slice: CABR_CONSENSUS_FINALIZATION_PHASE2_SQLITE_AUDIT_TRAIL
Worker: W1

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Foundup Foundup merged commit 738b783 into main May 13, 2026
3 checks passed
@Foundup Foundup deleted the feat/cabr-consensus-sqlite-audit branch May 13, 2026 05:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant