Skip to content

build(deps): bump github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/iam from 1.53.6 to 1.53.7#388

Merged
intel352 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
dependabot/go_modules/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/iam-1.53.7
Apr 5, 2026
Merged

build(deps): bump github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/iam from 1.53.6 to 1.53.7#388
intel352 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
dependabot/go_modules/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/iam-1.53.7

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 30, 2026

Bumps github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/iam from 1.53.6 to 1.53.7.

Commits

@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file go Pull requests that update go code labels Mar 30, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Mar 30, 2026

⏱ Benchmark Results

No significant performance regressions detected.

benchstat comparison (baseline → PR)
## benchstat: baseline → PR
baseline-bench.txt:245: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:324084: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:659329: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:986897: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:1287573: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:1631683: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:245: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:347025: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:637117: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:944273: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:1274952: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:1615747: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/dynamic
cpu: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor                
                            │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt        │
                            │       sec/op       │    sec/op      vs base              │
InterpreterCreation-4              3.138m ± 215%   3.676m ± 160%       ~ (p=0.240 n=6)
ComponentLoad-4                    3.588m ±  10%   3.627m ±   1%       ~ (p=0.310 n=6)
ComponentExecute-4                 1.937µ ±   1%   1.933µ ±   1%       ~ (p=0.420 n=6)
PoolContention/workers-1-4         1.082µ ±   5%   1.081µ ±   4%       ~ (p=0.623 n=6)
PoolContention/workers-2-4         1.082µ ±   2%   1.084µ ±   2%       ~ (p=0.846 n=6)
PoolContention/workers-4-4         1.087µ ±   1%   1.081µ ±   1%       ~ (p=0.132 n=6)
PoolContention/workers-8-4         1.086µ ±   1%   1.092µ ±   1%  +0.60% (p=0.030 n=6)
PoolContention/workers-16-4        1.089µ ±   2%   1.095µ ±   1%       ~ (p=0.818 n=6)
ComponentLifecycle-4               3.587m ±   1%   3.636m ±   0%  +1.38% (p=0.002 n=6)
SourceValidation-4                 2.237µ ±   1%   2.265µ ±   3%  +1.27% (p=0.002 n=6)
RegistryConcurrent-4               817.6n ±   4%   799.7n ±   3%       ~ (p=0.180 n=6)
LoaderLoadFromString-4             3.618m ±   1%   3.641m ±   2%  +0.63% (p=0.026 n=6)
geomean                            17.42µ          17.68µ         +1.53%

                            │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt         │
                            │        B/op        │     B/op      vs base                │
InterpreterCreation-4               2.027Mi ± 0%   2.027Mi ± 0%       ~ (p=0.394 n=6)
ComponentLoad-4                     2.180Mi ± 0%   2.180Mi ± 0%       ~ (p=0.974 n=6)
ComponentExecute-4                  1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-1-4          1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-2-4          1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-4-4          1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-8-4          1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-16-4         1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
ComponentLifecycle-4                2.183Mi ± 0%   2.183Mi ± 0%       ~ (p=0.981 n=6)
SourceValidation-4                  1.984Ki ± 0%   1.984Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
RegistryConcurrent-4                1.133Ki ± 0%   1.133Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
LoaderLoadFromString-4              2.182Mi ± 0%   2.182Mi ± 0%  +0.00% (p=0.028 n=6)
geomean                             15.25Ki        15.25Ki       +0.00%
¹ all samples are equal

                            │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt        │
                            │     allocs/op      │  allocs/op   vs base                │
InterpreterCreation-4                15.68k ± 0%   15.68k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6)
ComponentLoad-4                      18.02k ± 0%   18.02k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6)
ComponentExecute-4                    25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-1-4            25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-2-4            25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-4-4            25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-8-4            25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-16-4           25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
ComponentLifecycle-4                 18.07k ± 0%   18.07k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SourceValidation-4                    32.00 ± 0%    32.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
RegistryConcurrent-4                  2.000 ± 0%    2.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
LoaderLoadFromString-4               18.06k ± 0%   18.06k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                               183.3         183.3       +0.00%
¹ all samples are equal

pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/middleware
                                  │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt       │
                                  │       sec/op       │   sec/op     vs base              │
CircuitBreakerDetection-4                  288.3n ± 5%   288.6n ± 5%       ~ (p=0.567 n=6)
CircuitBreakerExecution_Success-4          22.52n ± 0%   22.52n ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6)
CircuitBreakerExecution_Failure-4          65.26n ± 3%   65.16n ± 0%       ~ (p=0.686 n=6)
geomean                                    75.10n        75.09n       -0.01%

                                  │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                  │        B/op        │    B/op     vs base                │
CircuitBreakerDetection-4                 144.0 ± 0%     144.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
CircuitBreakerExecution_Success-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
CircuitBreakerExecution_Failure-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                              ²               +0.00%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

                                  │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                  │     allocs/op      │ allocs/op   vs base                │
CircuitBreakerDetection-4                 1.000 ± 0%     1.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
CircuitBreakerExecution_Success-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
CircuitBreakerExecution_Failure-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                              ²               +0.00%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/module
                                 │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                 │       sec/op       │    sec/op     vs base              │
JQTransform_Simple-4                     869.3n ± 30%   914.4n ± 27%       ~ (p=0.132 n=6)
JQTransform_ObjectConstruction-4         1.445µ ±  0%   1.460µ ±  1%  +1.04% (p=0.004 n=6)
JQTransform_ArraySelect-4                3.283µ ±  2%   3.284µ ±  2%       ~ (p=0.970 n=6)
JQTransform_Complex-4                    38.50µ ±  1%   38.18µ ±  3%       ~ (p=0.485 n=6)
JQTransform_Throughput-4                 1.767µ ±  1%   1.782µ ±  1%  +0.85% (p=0.006 n=6)
SSEPublishDelivery-4                     68.97n ±  2%   70.71n ±  0%  +2.53% (p=0.002 n=6)
geomean                                  1.638µ         1.662µ        +1.45%

                                 │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt         │
                                 │        B/op        │     B/op      vs base                │
JQTransform_Simple-4                   1.273Ki ± 0%     1.273Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_ObjectConstruction-4       1.773Ki ± 0%     1.773Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_ArraySelect-4              2.625Ki ± 0%     2.625Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_Complex-4                  16.22Ki ± 0%     16.22Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_Throughput-4               1.984Ki ± 0%     1.984Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SSEPublishDelivery-4                     0.000 ± 0%       0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                             ²                 +0.00%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

                                 │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                 │     allocs/op      │ allocs/op   vs base                │
JQTransform_Simple-4                     10.00 ± 0%     10.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_ObjectConstruction-4         15.00 ± 0%     15.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_ArraySelect-4                30.00 ± 0%     30.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_Complex-4                    324.0 ± 0%     324.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_Throughput-4                 17.00 ± 0%     17.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SSEPublishDelivery-4                     0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                             ²               +0.00%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/schema
                                    │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt       │
                                    │       sec/op       │   sec/op     vs base              │
SchemaValidation_Simple-4                    1.095µ ± 9%   1.107µ ± 2%       ~ (p=0.167 n=6)
SchemaValidation_AllFields-4                 1.689µ ± 7%   1.692µ ± 9%       ~ (p=0.699 n=6)
SchemaValidation_FormatValidation-4          1.598µ ± 4%   1.615µ ± 2%       ~ (p=0.310 n=6)
SchemaValidation_ManySchemas-4               1.805µ ± 4%   1.814µ ± 1%       ~ (p=0.513 n=6)
geomean                                      1.519µ        1.531µ       +0.74%

                                    │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                    │        B/op        │    B/op     vs base                │
SchemaValidation_Simple-4                   0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_AllFields-4                0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_FormatValidation-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_ManySchemas-4              0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                                ²               +0.00%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

                                    │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                    │     allocs/op      │ allocs/op   vs base                │
SchemaValidation_Simple-4                   0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_AllFields-4                0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_FormatValidation-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_ManySchemas-4              0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                                ²               +0.00%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/store
                                   │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt        │
                                   │       sec/op       │    sec/op     vs base               │
EventStoreAppend_InMemory-4                1.260µ ±  9%   1.281µ ± 12%        ~ (p=0.699 n=6)
EventStoreAppend_SQLite-4                  1.339m ±  3%   1.362m ±  5%        ~ (p=0.065 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-10-4           13.92µ ±  2%   13.82µ ±  6%        ~ (p=0.699 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-50-4           78.47µ ±  2%   80.10µ ±  4%        ~ (p=0.310 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-100-4          125.2µ ± 27%   158.8µ ±  3%  +26.82% (p=0.015 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-500-4          646.8µ ±  0%   641.4µ ±  1%        ~ (p=0.132 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-1000-4         1.324m ±  1%   1.294m ±  0%   -2.26% (p=0.002 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-10-4             105.1µ ±  1%   107.0µ ±  1%   +1.74% (p=0.004 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-50-4             246.2µ ±  1%   247.2µ ±  0%        ~ (p=0.065 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-100-4            418.8µ ±  0%   417.9µ ±  0%        ~ (p=0.310 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-500-4            1.785m ±  0%   1.796m ±  1%   +0.60% (p=0.009 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-1000-4           3.491m ±  1%   3.549m ±  2%   +1.65% (p=0.041 n=6)
geomean                                    220.7µ         226.2µ         +2.49%

                                   │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt         │
                                   │        B/op        │     B/op      vs base                │
EventStoreAppend_InMemory-4                 768.5 ± 10%     809.5 ± 7%       ~ (p=0.225 n=6)
EventStoreAppend_SQLite-4                 1.985Ki ±  2%   1.983Ki ± 3%       ~ (p=0.242 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-10-4          7.953Ki ±  0%   7.953Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-50-4          46.62Ki ±  0%   46.62Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-100-4         94.48Ki ±  0%   94.48Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-500-4         472.8Ki ±  0%   472.8Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=0.061 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-1000-4        944.3Ki ±  0%   944.3Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=0.288 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-10-4            16.74Ki ±  0%   16.74Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-50-4            87.14Ki ±  0%   87.14Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-100-4           175.4Ki ±  0%   175.4Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-500-4           846.1Ki ±  0%   846.1Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=0.448 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-1000-4          1.639Mi ±  0%   1.639Mi ± 0%       ~ (p=0.485 n=6)
geomean                                   67.19Ki         67.48Ki       +0.42%
¹ all samples are equal

                                   │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt        │
                                   │     allocs/op      │  allocs/op   vs base                │
EventStoreAppend_InMemory-4                  7.000 ± 0%    7.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
EventStoreAppend_SQLite-4                    53.00 ± 0%    53.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-10-4             125.0 ± 0%    125.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-50-4             653.0 ± 0%    653.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-100-4           1.306k ± 0%   1.306k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-500-4           6.514k ± 0%   6.514k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-1000-4          13.02k ± 0%   13.02k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-10-4               382.0 ± 0%    382.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-50-4              1.852k ± 0%   1.852k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-100-4             3.681k ± 0%   3.681k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-500-4             18.54k ± 0%   18.54k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-1000-4            37.29k ± 0%   37.29k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                     1.162k        1.162k       +0.00%
¹ all samples are equal

Benchmarks run with go test -bench=. -benchmem -count=6.
Regressions ≥ 20% are flagged. Results compared via benchstat.

@intel352
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dependabot recreate

Bumps [github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/iam](https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2) from 1.53.6 to 1.53.7.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/releases)
- [Commits](aws/aws-sdk-go-v2@service/ecs/v1.53.6...service/ecs/v1.53.7)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/iam
  dependency-version: 1.53.7
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/go_modules/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/iam-1.53.7 branch from 5064b0b to e2c8521 Compare March 30, 2026 17:01
@intel352 intel352 merged commit 7afffe7 into main Apr 5, 2026
15 of 16 checks passed
@intel352 intel352 deleted the dependabot/go_modules/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/iam-1.53.7 branch April 5, 2026 04:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file go Pull requests that update go code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant