Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.12-slim to 3.15-rc-alpine3.23#94

Open
kburger wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-fd90047e8d199c179b8ef8750093ea6e
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.12-slim to 3.15-rc-alpine3.23#94
kburger wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-fd90047e8d199c179b8ef8750093ea6e

Conversation

@kburger

@kburger kburger commented Apr 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 3 vulnerabilities in the dockerfile dependencies of this project.

Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • Dockerfile

We recommend upgrading to python:3.15-rc-alpine3.23, as this image has only 0 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
low severity CVE-2005-2541
SNYK-DEBIAN13-TAR-5696683
  187  
low severity Out-of-Bounds
SNYK-DEBIAN13-GLIBC-5681241
  182  
low severity Out-of-Bounds
SNYK-DEBIAN13-GLIBC-5681241
  182  
low severity CVE-2019-1010023
SNYK-DEBIAN13-GLIBC-5681177
  152  
low severity CVE-2019-1010023
SNYK-DEBIAN13-GLIBC-5681177
  152  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Out-of-Bounds

@kburger

kburger commented Apr 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@agjharms snyk suggests to move to an alpine release instead of the current slim image, upgrade from 3.12 to 3.15, and it uses an rc version. Is this something we can use, or do we prefer the same slim image, non rc, on a 3.12 branch? (assuming fixes to these vulnerabilities are available in a similar flavour)

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants