support redirection and pipe in the commands#130
Open
drzraf wants to merge 2 commits intoLazza:masterfrom
Open
support redirection and pipe in the commands#130drzraf wants to merge 2 commits intoLazza:masterfrom
drzraf wants to merge 2 commits intoLazza:masterfrom
Conversation
Owner
|
Thank you, this seems quite interesting, although I am getting several errors. I tried to run Now I am getting an error on the redirection part. Moreover, it seems that on Windows the file paths are being mangled, e.g. try to do this: It seems that Python is reading the backslash as an escape character. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fix #9
based on (and replace) #129
Things like:
recoverable > /tmp/a.txtbecome possible (for any other command)locate ... | grep foobartoohelp | grep z > /tmp/test.txtThe most painful part of the diff is switching from
print()to return (so that Python output could be reused insubprocess.run()). Another option was to write the stdout write (interceptingprint) but it sounded cumbersome.