Draft for EFP project access addition

[hdrei]

Drafting addition about access with EFP managed projects.

Branch preview: https://lumi-supercomputer-docs-preview.rahtiapp.fi/origin/EFP-projects-access/firststeps/accessLUMI/

I have troubles with coming up with a good naming for the tabs. Better suggestions are welcome.

Also, I'd like to refer directly to the correct page in EFP docs instead of the home page of the docs. I wonder if one of these pages would be the correct one to guide users to

https://docs.my-eurohpc.eu/my-efp/
https://docs.my-eurohpc.eu/allocations/

or, if the home page of the docs is good. (The myEFP page doesn't seem to have content yet, though.)

[hdrei]

Will ask the review of szakib for this, once they accept my collaboration invitation.
Meanwhile, I'm still wondering how to make the page less unclear for the users.
I wonder if e.g. @mszpindler would have some thoughts or ideas?

[mszpindler]

Will ask the review of szakib for this, once they accept my collaboration invitation. Meanwhile, I'm still wondering how to make the page less unclear for the users. I wonder if e.g. @mszpindler would have some thoughts or ideas?

I would rethink how to define "project types". For my understanding there are two different aspects: resource pool EuroHPC JU or national) and which portal allows control over project. The latter is even more complicated - national is not simply puhuri; there are multiple portals. In other words - what makes project different from the other.

[szakib]

Other than this, the rest is okay,

[szakib]

Hosting Entities' helpdesks are the ones to be contacted first, and only questions that

• are about EFP and
• are not possible to solve by the local helpdesk
  Should be forwarded (by the CSC/LUMI helpdesk) to the EFP Helpdesk.
  CC @Nortamo

[mszpindler]

This is now reformulated, is it clear enough?

[mszpindler]

Will ask the review of szakib for this, once they accept my collaboration invitation. Meanwhile, I'm still wondering how to make the page less unclear for the users. I wonder if e.g. @mszpindler would have some thoughts or ideas?

I would rethink how to define "project types". For my understanding there are two different aspects: resource pool EuroHPC JU or national) and which portal allows control over project. The latter is even more complicated - national is not simply puhuri; there are multiple portals. In other words - what makes project different from the other.

[mszpindler]

@hdrei Please ignore my previous comment; you were right that EFP makes difference in how project is managed.

[szakib]

@mszpindler Please see my comments in the review above.

[mszpindler]

@hdrei proposing slightly simpler description of different project types, please agree.