docs: qualify README claims for intellectual honesty #980
+4
−4
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Change "Core Innovation" to "Core Approach" (more accurate) - Change "key differentiator" to "explores" (less marketing) - Correct accuracy figure (46.7% -> 100%, not 33% -> 100%) - Add context that all 45 tasks share same navigation entry point - Link to publication roadmap for methodology and limitations - Change "No technical expertise needed" to "Reduced prompt engineering" The goal is accuracy over marketing appeal. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR adds qualifiers to claims in the README to ensure intellectual honesty, per the publication roadmap.
Changes:
Rationale
The goal is accuracy over marketing appeal. Per the publication roadmap:
Test plan
Generated with Claude Code