Implement issue #239: Inspector Graph: better component titles

[LabordePierre]

No description provided.

[YannLeGoff]

It is complicated for me to understand wich label is the type, wich is the implementation and wich is the name.

What do you think of the picture ?

[YannLeGoff]

It is complicated for me to understand wich label is the type, wich is the implementation and wich is the name.

What do you think of the picture ?

Replace Impl: with Class:

[LabordePierre]

It is complicated for me to understand wich label is the type, wich is the implementation and wich is the name.
What do you think of the picture ?

Replace Impl: with Class:

@LANDAISB any opinion? We discuss on that before the commit and I prefer not add prefix to have lighter display.

[LabordePierre]

I prefer "Impl" instead of "Class"

[LANDAISB]

I prefer to add default name (ie. always display the key of component), not sure it's necessary to have a different look than a choosed name.
I think there is no need to prefix type, class, key (always same order, different looks).
Maybe just add full description (with prefix) on hover ?

[YannLeGoff]

I added a better hover text.

[LabordePierre]

I added a better hover text.

This is fine and respond to having a "light" visual component but with more informations if needed.

[LabordePierre]

I don't know why tests are not pass, but there is currently an incident:

Edit: ok this is nice.

[LabordePierre]

@ELePors @LANDAISB @LouisePla, please review.