Skip to content

[N-05] VestingWallet audit#436

Open
ericnordelo wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/vesting-wallet-N05
Open

[N-05] VestingWallet audit#436
ericnordelo wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/vesting-wallet-N05

Conversation

@ericnordelo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 69057574-2a50-4266-af00-32f21598f92a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 85448ce and 53e135c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • contracts/finance/sources/vesting_wallet.move
👮 Files not reviewed due to content moderation or server errors (1)
  • contracts/finance/sources/vesting_wallet.move

📝 Walkthrough

[!WARNING]

Walkthrough skipped

File diffs could not be summarized.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/vesting-wallet-N05

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.54%. Comparing base (85448ce) to head (53e135c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #436   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.54%   96.54%           
=======================================
  Files          32       32           
  Lines        3324     3324           
  Branches      784      784           
=======================================
  Hits         3209     3209           
  Misses         70       70           
  Partials       45       45           
Flag Coverage Δ
contracts/access 65.46% <ø> (ø)
contracts/allowance 52.00% <ø> (ø)
contracts/finance 26.07% <ø> (ø)
contracts/timelock 54.57% <ø> (ø)
contracts/utils 44.09% <ø> (ø)
math/core 86.97% <ø> (ø)
math/fixed_point 61.57% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@bidzyyys bidzyyys left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants