Fix estimation for sequestration potentials

[toniseibold]

Ensuring that the optimistic sequestration potential is equal or greater than the neutral estimation. In raw data e.g. data/CO2JRC_OpenFormats/CO2Stop_DataInterrogationSystem/Hydrocarbon_Traps.csv optimistic assumption is zero in some cases while neutral estimations are > 0.

Removing "conservative estimate Mt" from config since this leads to double counting of the sequestration potential in rule build_clustered_co2_sequestration_potentials.

• before: total sequestration potential of 89,982 Mt
• after: total sequestration potential of 16,227 Mt

Checklist

• I tested my contribution locally and it works as intended.
• Code and workflow changes are sufficiently documented. not applicable
• Changed dependencies are added to pixi.toml (using pixi add <dependency-name>). not_applicable
• Changes in configuration options are added in config/config.default.yaml.
• Changes in configuration options are documented in doc/configtables/*.csv. not applicable
• For new data sources or versions, these instructions have been followed. not applicable
• A release note doc/release_notes.rst is added. not applicable

[fneum]

@lisazeyen, if you have a moment, could you say whether that's correct? I think you once mentioned something specific about the accounting of the sequestration potentials.

[lisazeyen]

I think we only considered high-density storage so far. But I am not sure if there is some double counting. I am currently on holidays until the 8/3 does this have some time? Then I could look at my notes at home. In my PhD thesis I wrote different numbers (total sequestration 18 Gt: 9 Gt gas, 5Gt oil, 4 Gt aquifer) and I am not sure where the mismatch is coming from, is it including onshore?