Point monthly review at CryptoCodexAuditBridge#59
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 362509d33c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| owner: ${{ github.repository_owner }} | ||
| repositories: | | ||
| SelfHostedCodexAuditBridge | ||
| CryptoCodexAuditBridge |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
TARGET_REPOSITORY is configurable via SELFHOSTED_CODEX_REVIEW_REPOSITORY, but the app-token step now hardcodes CryptoCodexAuditBridge. In environments that still set SELFHOSTED_CODEX_REVIEW_REPOSITORY to another repo (for example the previous SelfHostedCodexAuditBridge value), the dispatch call targets that repo while the GitHub App token is scoped to a different repo, causing 403/404 on POST /dispatches unless a fallback PAT is present. This regression was introduced by changing only the token scope constant, so the token scope should be computed from the same configured target repository.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
No description provided.