tests: fix creating test qrexec services#675
Conversation
Qrexec service file is supposed to be a proper executable. If it's a script, it need a shebang. Lacking that, it sometimes will work (qrexec does call services via shell in some situations), but is unreliable.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #675 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 70.25% 70.21% -0.05%
==========================================
Files 59 59
Lines 12747 12747
==========================================
- Hits 8956 8950 -6
- Misses 3791 3797 +6
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
OpenQA test summaryComplete test suite and dependencies: https://openqa.qubes-os.org/tests/overview?distri=qubesos&version=4.3&build=2025041403-4.3&flavor=pull-requests Test run included the following:
New failures, excluding unstableCompared to: https://openqa.qubes-os.org/tests/overview?distri=qubesos&version=4.3&build=2025031804-4.3&flavor=update
Failed tests16 failures
Fixed failuresCompared to: https://openqa.qubes-os.org/tests/132953#dependencies 10 fixed
Unstable testsDetailsPerformance TestsPerformance degradation:16 performance degradations
Remaining performance tests:56 tests
|
Qrexec service file is supposed to be a proper executable. If it's a
script, it need a shebang. Lacking that, it sometimes will work (qrexec
does call services via shell in some situations), but is unreliable.