Revert "Support DPS feature (#2750)"

[ctowns]

Cherry pick 30ec193 from main -> beta:

This reverts commit edfba7e. Also removes the 'IS_MODULAR_PROFILE' field which is no longer needed.

Check all that apply

Type of Change

• WWST Certification Request
  • If this is your first time contributing code:
    • I have reviewed the README.md file
    • I have reviewed the CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md file
    • I have signed the CLA
  • I plan on entering a WWST Certification Request or have entered a request through the WWST Certification console at developer.smartthings.com
• Bug fix
• New feature
• Refactor

Checklist

• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code in hard-to-understand areas
• I have verified my changes by testing with a device or have communicated a plan for testing
• I am adding new behavior, such as adding a sub-driver, and have added and run new unit tests to cover the new behavior

Description of Change

Summary of Completed Tests

[github-actions]

Duplicate profile check: Warning - duplicate profiles detected.
lock-modular-embedded-unlatch.yml == lock-modular.yml

[github-actions]

Channel deleted.

[github-actions]

Test Results

   72 files    493 suites   0s ⏱️
2 573 tests 2 573 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
4 408 runs  4 408 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 851da69.

[github-actions]

File	Coverage
All files	80%	❌
/home/runner/work/SmartThingsEdgeDrivers/SmartThingsEdgeDrivers/drivers/SmartThings/matter-lock/src/new-matter-lock/can_handle.lua	90%	✅
/home/runner/work/SmartThingsEdgeDrivers/SmartThingsEdgeDrivers/drivers/SmartThings/matter-lock/src/new-matter-lock/init.lua	77%	❌
/home/runner/work/SmartThingsEdgeDrivers/SmartThingsEdgeDrivers/drivers/SmartThings/matter-lock/src/lazy_load_subdriver.lua	57%	❌
/home/runner/work/SmartThingsEdgeDrivers/SmartThingsEdgeDrivers/drivers/SmartThings/matter-lock/src/init.lua	92%	✅
/home/runner/work/SmartThingsEdgeDrivers/SmartThingsEdgeDrivers/drivers/SmartThings/matter-lock/src/lock_utils.lua	68%	❌

Minimum allowed coverage is 90%

Generated by 🐒 cobertura-action against 851da69

[tpmanley]

I tested this with the Yale lock that supports DPS and confirmed the DPS feature isn't exposed, and also confirmed other functionality like PIN code setup and schedules