Skip to content

Conversation

@tonywu1999
Copy link
Contributor

@tonywu1999 tonywu1999 commented Jan 29, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added progress bar feedback during protein processing in the doseResponseFit function for improved user visibility.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected field name reference in documentation.
  • Chores

    • Updated package dependencies to include development and testing tools.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR adds progress bar functionality to the doseResponseFit function for user feedback during protein processing. Dependencies are expanded in both Imports and Suggests sections, with corresponding NAMESPACE entries added. A variable name reference in documentation is also corrected.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Package Configuration
DESCRIPTION, NAMESPACE
Added utils to Imports; expanded Suggests with tidyverse, boot, purrr, gridExtra, knitr, rmarkdown, BiocStyle, testthat. Added importFrom entries for setTxtProgressBar and txtProgressBar utilities.
Core Functionality
R/Fit_Isotonic_Regression.R
Integrated progress bar display in doseResponseFit protein processing loop using txtProgressBar and setTxtProgressBar for user feedback.
Documentation
man/doseResponseFit.Rd
Corrected variable name in example from adjust_pval to adj.pvalue in filtering condition.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Poem

🐰 A progress bar hops into view,
Dependencies gathered, both old and new,
Variables fixed with a careful glance,
Users will smile at each loop's advance!
Thump thump! — the changes are done with flair ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: adding a progress bar to doseResponseFit function. It is concise, specific, and directly reflects the primary modification evident in the changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants