Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1,844 changes: 922 additions & 922 deletions Kimi Code a8032c7f-bfa2-4794-9571-354c77ccb533 2a 4-20-26.txt

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

2,176 changes: 1,088 additions & 1,088 deletions Kimi Code a8032c7f-bfa2-4794-9571-354c77ccb533 3a 4-20-26.txt

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,66 +1,66 @@
1. Pull origin/main to get the latest changes.
2. Rebase or merge my python3 fix on top.
3. Push again.
4. Then decide with the user how to proceed with the failing tests and stages D/E.
Given the context limit, I should be concise. Let me pull, merge, push.
• Origin/main moved ahead (likely the state-witness bot). Pulling, merging, and pushing the standards fix.
• Used Shell (cd /home/idor/orthogonal-...ull origin main --no-edit)
Failed with exit code: 128
• Git is complaining because I have local commits (the line-ending normalization and the python3 fix) and origin/main ha
s moved ahead. I need to specify merge or rebase. Since these are trivial local commits on top of the previous main, I
'll just do git pull origin main --no-rebase (merge).
• Used Shell (cd /home/idor/orthogonal-...ain --no-rebase --no-edit)
• The merge pulled in new session log files from origin/main. Now I can push my standards fix.
• Used Shell (cd /home/idor/orthogonal-...g && git push origin main)
• Good, main is pushed. Now I need to give the user a clear status update and ask for direction on the next steps.
Current state:
• main is synced with origin and includes PR #150 (checkpoint) + my python3 fix.
• Onboarding smoke tests: PASS (49 passed).
• Standards check: Many pass now, but some real failures remain (BC-003, CS-002, OE-247, YS-002, YS-004, YS-006). Some
re false positives (e.g., os.urandom in crypto, shutil.rmtree in tests).
• Pytest: 41 collection errors due to missing imports across many test files. This is a significant issue.
Pending work from checkpoint:
• Stage D: Close 14 stale Copilot draft PRs + 13 bot-noise issues.
• Stage E: Review/rebase/advance non-draft PRs #91, #85, #26.
• Fix failing tests/standards (41 test collection errors).
Given the user's instruction to be efficient and the context limit, I should present a concise status and ask which tr
ack to prioritize. The user said "if you have any ambiguities make a forwardable question set for copilot." So I shoul
d frame this as a clear question set.
But wait, the user also said "finish everything" earlier. They might want me to just proceed. However, 41 test collect
ion errors is a lot. Stage D (closing stale PRs/issues) might be simpler and more immediately valuable because it clea
rs noise. Stage E (reviewing real PRs) is also high value.
I think the best approach is to give a summary and ask whether to:
1. Fix the 41 pytest collection errors first (technical debt).
2. Do Stage D housekeeping (close stale drafts + bot issues).
3. Do Stage E (review #91, #85, #26).
Actually, looking at the user's style, they want me to be decisive. But they also said "make a forwardable question se
t for copilot who can enumerate answers ill get them back to you." This suggests they are willing to answer questions
to resolve ambiguity.
Given the scale, I should provide a short, forwardable question set.
Wait, I realize I should check what the 41 test errors actually are. Maybe they are all the same pattern (e.g., missin
g HHIAnalyzer or similar). If it's a single systematic issue, I can fix it quickly. Let me check a few of the errors.
• main is synced and pushed. Verification quartet partial results:
⠸ Composing... 1s · 83 tokens
── input ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
youddKilled
idor@Tony:~$
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
agent (kimi-for-coding ●) ~ ctrl-j: newline | /feedback: send feedback
context: 34.9% (91.5k/262.1k)
1. Pull origin/main to get the latest changes.
2. Rebase or merge my python3 fix on top.
3. Push again.
4. Then decide with the user how to proceed with the failing tests and stages D/E.

Given the context limit, I should be concise. Let me pull, merge, push.
• Origin/main moved ahead (likely the state-witness bot). Pulling, merging, and pushing the standards fix.
• Used Shell (cd /home/idor/orthogonal-...ull origin main --no-edit)
Failed with exit code: 128
• Git is complaining because I have local commits (the line-ending normalization and the python3 fix) and origin/main ha
s moved ahead. I need to specify merge or rebase. Since these are trivial local commits on top of the previous main, I
'll just do git pull origin main --no-rebase (merge).
• Used Shell (cd /home/idor/orthogonal-...ain --no-rebase --no-edit)
• The merge pulled in new session log files from origin/main. Now I can push my standards fix.
• Used Shell (cd /home/idor/orthogonal-...g && git push origin main)
• Good, main is pushed. Now I need to give the user a clear status update and ask for direction on the next steps.

Current state:

• main is synced with origin and includes PR #150 (checkpoint) + my python3 fix.
• Onboarding smoke tests: PASS (49 passed).
• Standards check: Many pass now, but some real failures remain (BC-003, CS-002, OE-247, YS-002, YS-004, YS-006). Some
re false positives (e.g., os.urandom in crypto, shutil.rmtree in tests).
• Pytest: 41 collection errors due to missing imports across many test files. This is a significant issue.

Pending work from checkpoint:

• Stage D: Close 14 stale Copilot draft PRs + 13 bot-noise issues.
• Stage E: Review/rebase/advance non-draft PRs #91, #85, #26.
• Fix failing tests/standards (41 test collection errors).

Given the user's instruction to be efficient and the context limit, I should present a concise status and ask which tr
ack to prioritize. The user said "if you have any ambiguities make a forwardable question set for copilot." So I shoul
d frame this as a clear question set.

But wait, the user also said "finish everything" earlier. They might want me to just proceed. However, 41 test collect
ion errors is a lot. Stage D (closing stale PRs/issues) might be simpler and more immediately valuable because it clea
rs noise. Stage E (reviewing real PRs) is also high value.

I think the best approach is to give a summary and ask whether to:

1. Fix the 41 pytest collection errors first (technical debt).
2. Do Stage D housekeeping (close stale drafts + bot issues).
3. Do Stage E (review #91, #85, #26).

Actually, looking at the user's style, they want me to be decisive. But they also said "make a forwardable question se
t for copilot who can enumerate answers ill get them back to you." This suggests they are willing to answer questions
to resolve ambiguity.

Given the scale, I should provide a short, forwardable question set.

Wait, I realize I should check what the 41 test errors actually are. Maybe they are all the same pattern (e.g., missin
g HHIAnalyzer or similar). If it's a single systematic issue, I can fix it quickly. Let me check a few of the errors.
• main is synced and pushed. Verification quartet partial results:
⠸ Composing... 1s · 83 tokens

── input ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
youddKilled
idor@Tony:~$




────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
agent (kimi-for-coding ●) ~ ctrl-j: newline | /feedback: send feedback
context: 34.9% (91.5k/262.1k)
7 changes: 4 additions & 3 deletions kernel/commonwealth/sabbath.py
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot Apr 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📝 Info: PHASE_4_REST → PHASE_4_COMMONWEALTH fixes a latent AttributeError

The old code at line 161 referenced CompletionPhase.PHASE_4_REST which doesn't exist in the enum (the enum has PHASE_4_COMMONWEALTH and PHASE_5_REST). This would raise AttributeError at runtime whenever check_completion_conditions was called with any phase other than PHASE_3_DOMAINS, because Python evaluates the elif condition eagerly. The fix correctly uses PHASE_4_COMMONWEALTH to match the phase 4 completion checker.

Open in Devin Review

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Real bug — fixed in 036e46b. CompletionPhase.PHASE_4_REST did not exist; the enum defines PHASE_4_COMMONWEALTH and PHASE_5_REST. Changed the dispatch to compare against PHASE_4_COMMONWEALTH, which matches the semantic intent of check_phase_4_complete. Verified: SabbathHalt.check_completion_conditions now dispatches correctly for both PHASE_3_DOMAINS and PHASE_4_COMMONWEALTH without raising AttributeError.

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
from enum import Enum, auto

from axioms.logic import ProofObject
from src.orthogonal_engineering.fraction_display import format_percent


class CompletionPhase(Enum):
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -157,7 +158,7 @@ def check_completion_conditions(
"""
if state.phase == CompletionPhase.PHASE_3_DOMAINS:
return self.completion_checker.check_phase_3_complete(state)
elif state.phase == CompletionPhase.PHASE_4_REST:
elif state.phase == CompletionPhase.PHASE_4_COMMONWEALTH:
return self.completion_checker.check_phase_4_complete(state)
else:
# Check if we can enter rest for current phase
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -202,7 +203,7 @@ def declare_halt(
rule="DeclareSabbathHalt",
premises=[
f"state_phase={state.phase.name}",
f"completion_ratio={float(state.completion_ratio()):.2%}",
f"completion_ratio={format_percent(state.completion_ratio(), 2)}",
f"timestamp={timestamp}",
f"reason={reason}",
],
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -251,7 +252,7 @@ def verify_rest(self, state: SystemState) -> Tuple[bool, ProofObject]:
f"is_halted=true",
f"halt_timestamp={self.halt_timestamp}",
f"halt_reason={self.halt_reason}",
f"completion_ratio={float(state.completion_ratio()):.2%}",
f"completion_ratio={format_percent(state.completion_ratio(), 2)}",
],
conclusion="valid rest state verified"
)
Expand Down
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions kernel/firmware/acpi_spec.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@

from axioms.logic import ProofObject
from axioms.real_analysis import ContinuousFunction
from src.orthogonal_engineering.fraction_display import format_decimal


class PowerState(Enum):
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -280,7 +281,7 @@ def read_temperature(self, thermal_zone: int) -> Tuple[Fraction, ProofObject]:
proof = ProofObject(
rule="ACPIReadTemperature",
premises=[f"thermal_zone={thermal_zone}"],
conclusion=f"temperature={float(temp):.1f}C"
conclusion=f"temperature={format_decimal(temp, 1)}C"
)

return temp, proof
Expand All @@ -305,7 +306,7 @@ def check_energy_budget(self) -> Tuple[bool, ProofObject]:

proof = ProofObject(
rule="ACPICheckEnergy",
premises=[f"remaining_joules={float(remaining):.2f}"],
premises=[f"remaining_joules={format_decimal(remaining, 2)}"],
conclusion=f"can_continue={can_continue}"
)

Expand Down
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions kernel/social/reputation.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
from enum import Enum, auto

from axioms.logic import ProofObject
from src.orthogonal_engineering.fraction_display import format_decimal
from axioms.measure_theory import Measure


Expand Down Expand Up @@ -66,7 +67,7 @@ def proof(self) -> ProofObject:
f"witness={self.witness_id}",
f"subject={self.subject_id}",
f"dimension={self.dimension.value}",
f"rating={float(self.rating):.3f}",
f"rating={format_decimal(self.rating, 3)}",
],
conclusion=f"testimony at {self.timestamp}"
)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -204,7 +205,7 @@ def get_reputation(
premises=[
f"identity={identity_id}",
f"witness_count={score.witness_count}",
f"overall={float(score.overall_score()):.3f}",
f"overall={format_decimal(score.overall_score(), 3)}",
],
conclusion="reputation retrieved"
)
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion kernel/tests/test_commonwealth.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@

from axioms.logic import ProofObject
from axioms.capability_security import Capability, Permission
from src.orthogonal_engineering.fraction_display import format_percent

from kernel.commonwealth import (
SovereignRole,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -576,7 +577,7 @@ def test_system_state_completion_ratio() -> Tuple[bool, ProofObject]:

return True, ProofObject(
rule="TestCompletionRatio",
premises=[f"ratio={float(ratio):.2%}"],
premises=[f"ratio={format_percent(ratio, 2)}"],
conclusion="completion ratio test passed"
)

Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions pr47_stewardship/witness/consent_log.jsonl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -64,3 +64,4 @@
{"action": "add-master-questioner-meta-layer", "authoriser": "@aidoruao", "candidate_id": "claude-20260418-pr137", "consent_hash": "229990d970a3bcdb314346ccf7ce367d68f8b51f7686b503e6a133f8fcf087f2", "justification": "Adding Master Questioner meta-layer (Agent #14): platform file, routing tools, schooling output, d_meta_reasoning domain, and registry updates per PR #137 mandate", "justification_hash": "6f4d62230eac212d742f03f0d59b2ac24ab40751d6eae12a2a60a24f9c2b560a", "rule_exceptions": [], "schema": "SOP-AI-HANDSHAKE-1.0", "scope_glob": "MASTER_QUESTIONER.md,tools/question_router.py,tools/schooling_output.py,src/domains/d_meta_reasoning/**,AGENT_CAPABILITIES_MATRIX.md,STANDARDS_REGISTRY.json,GLOSSARY.md", "scope_hash": "22d07e735cd377a0f65237a4a503b9ecac6940caacedd98788ad3c1901db11b5", "timestamp": "2026-04-18T07:57:43Z"}
{"schema": "SOP-AI-HANDSHAKE-1.0", "candidate_id": "kimi-cli-ea92d034", "authoriser": "@aidoruao", "action": "pr139_aerospace_floor_polymath_domains", "scope_glob": "src/domains/d_aerospace_floor/**,src/domains/d_astrophysics/**,src/domains/d_materials_science/**,src/domains/d_fluid_dynamics/**,src/domains/d_thermodynamics/**,src/domains/d_electromagnetism/**,src/domains/d_biochemistry/**,src/domains/d_neuroscience/**,src/domains/d_systems_engineering/**,src/domains/d_reliability_engineering/**,src/domains/d_control_systems/**,src/domains/d_signal_processing/**,src/domains/d_structural_engineering/**,src/domains/d_manufacturing/**,src/domains/d_mechatronics/**,src/domains/d_metrology/**,src/domains/d_topology/**,src/domains/d_differential_geometry/**,src/domains/d_abstract_algebra/**,src/domains/d_category_theory/**,src/domains/d_probability_theory/**,src/domains/d_statistics/**,src/domains/d_information_theory/**,src/domains/d_epistemology_formal/**,src/domains/d_logic_formal/**,src/domains/d_philosophy_of_science/**,src/domains/d_phenomenology/**,src/domains/d_political_philosophy/**,src/domains/d_music_theory/**,src/domains/d_visual_arts/**,src/domains/d_architecture_design/**,src/domains/d_game_design/**,src/domains/d_electrical_trades/**,src/domains/d_plumbing_trades/**,src/domains/d_hvac/**,src/domains/d_welding/**,STANDARDS_REGISTRY.json,GLOSSARY.md,audit/aerospace_floor_audit.py", "rule_exceptions": ["mass_change"], "justification": "PR #139: Universal Aerospace Floor meta-standard domain (d_aerospace_floor) + 35 polymath domains + AF-001..AF-010 standards registry entries + existing domain upgrades + glossary updates. Previous Copilot sessions failed to push; Kimi CLI session ea92d034-2115-4447-9c3b-3c896f1fcbb8 re-implements and pushes via authenticated git.", "timestamp": "2026-04-18T10:46:12Z", "consent_hash": "d15ec3a72414b805275da6165a2875b16440fc8b56ac2c985f71830749e5c5ed"}
{"action": "checkpoint-stages-a-through-g", "authoriser": "@aidoruao", "candidate_id": "devin-20260419-stage-checkpoint", "consent_hash": "4bba78f4c50fd7d28b3b894f5cd43599658b67b99adff09139a1b5a104e6e744", "justification": "Cross-session continuity-of-body artifact for the 'finish everything' campaign; resume-point contract for next AI instance.", "justification_hash": "d10f30b707e2a98a6b8b642605f7fe0bd11826a66f1034e8459e904617256c1a", "rule_exceptions": [], "schema": "SOP-AI-HANDSHAKE-1.0", "scope_glob": "CHECKPOINT_STAGES_A_THROUGH_G.md", "scope_hash": "43a07aad30dd4c08e48e5c3722ca5c62dc586ef9915a447e7ee4750a932c9155", "timestamp": "2026-04-20T04:25:35Z"}
{"action": "stage-b-cleanup-float-stubs", "authoriser": "@aidoruao", "candidate_id": "devin-20260420-stage-b", "consent_hash": "657d70e0fd47adbeb2db6186f9df957c499fa9d7a4ebf8a3bc23fb2e9feb3306", "justification": "Stage B cleanup sweep: eliminate real float() calls and NotImplementedError stubs in production code per CS-001", "justification_hash": "d5fe9e4a0b79986f87578773c2aab73b64433d4bf49103bc4489009521a99326", "rule_exceptions": [], "schema": "SOP-AI-HANDSHAKE-1.0", "scope_glob": "src/**,kernel/**", "scope_hash": "d735c4bce826b80eef4ce524c87ea28dcc80a2748cc3cce0d31333c1b682fae7", "timestamp": "2026-04-20T03:00:46Z"}
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion src/creative_systems/semantics/semiotic_engine.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
from fractions import Fraction
from enum import Enum, auto

from src.orthogonal_engineering.fraction_display import format_percent


class SignType(Enum):
"""Peirce's trichotomy of signs."""
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -198,7 +200,7 @@ def generate_interpretation_guide(self, domain: str) -> str:
lines = [
f"# Semiotic Guide: {system.name}",
f"\nInterpretive Community: {', '.join(system.interpretive_community)}",
f"Sign Coverage: {float(system.coverage()):.1%}",
f"Sign Coverage: {format_percent(system.coverage(), 1)}",
"\n## Sign Inventory",
]

Expand Down
Loading
Loading