Skip to content

Conversation

@BrayanDSO
Copy link
Member

Purpose / Description

Approach

In the commits

How Has This Been Tested?

Emulator 31

Screen_recording_20251227_162711.mp4

Checklist

Please, go through these checks before submitting the PR.

  • You have a descriptive commit message with a short title (first line, max 50 chars).
  • You have commented your code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • You have performed a self-review of your own code
  • UI changes: include screenshots of all affected screens (in particular showing any new or changed strings)
  • UI Changes: You have tested your change using the Google Accessibility Scanner

removed in a500fe1 when Arthur tried to join the old and new study screen enums

Adding it back it's necessary because I need it to be inside the `autoadvance` package so it can implement a sealed interface

since the old study screen will be eventually gone, duplicating the class again seemed like the fastest approach.
@BrayanDSO BrayanDSO changed the title refactor+test(auto-advance) refactor+test: Auto advance Dec 27, 2025
@BrayanDSO BrayanDSO force-pushed the test/auto-advance branch 3 times, most recently from a5614da to 0821d4c Compare December 27, 2025 20:35
Copy link
Member

@david-allison david-allison left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Whoops: this is a request for a few comment in the review/commits

@david-allison david-allison added the Needs Author Reply Waiting for a reply from the original author label Dec 28, 2025
@BrayanDSO BrayanDSO removed the Needs Author Reply Waiting for a reply from the original author label Dec 28, 2025
Copy link
Member

@david-allison david-allison left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cheers, nothing blocking

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
* Copyright (c) 2025 Hari Srinivasan <harisrini21@gmail.com>
* Copyright (c) 2024 Brayan Oliveira <brayandso.dev@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your call on 24/25, I believe you also moved to: <69634269+brayandso@users.noreply.github.com> in newer commits

import kotlinx.coroutines.CompletableDeferred
import kotlinx.coroutines.test.StandardTestDispatcher
import kotlinx.coroutines.test.TestScope
import kotlinx.coroutines.test.advanceTimeBy
Copy link
Member

@david-allison david-allison Dec 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

advanceTimeBy has an override which accepts a Duration

@david-allison david-allison added Needs Second Approval Has one approval, one more approval to merge and removed Needs Review labels Dec 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs Second Approval Has one approval, one more approval to merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants