Bump fast-jwt for security fixes#137
Open
MisterJimson wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Made-with: Cursor
✅ Deploy Preview for sst-docs canceled.
|
theodiablo
suggested changes
May 28, 2026
theodiablo
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, much needed! Thanks for raising @MisterJimson 🙏
We've also been flagged this, another CVE has been released (CVE-2026-44351) since this PR has been opened, it's now recommended to upgrade to 6.2.4.
| "esbuild": "0.18.13", | ||
| "express": "^4.18.2", | ||
| "fast-jwt": "^3.1.1", | ||
| "fast-jwt": "^6.2.0", |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| "fast-jwt": "^6.2.0", | |
| "fast-jwt": "^6.2.4", |
| "esbuild": "0.18.13", | ||
| "express": "^4.18.2", | ||
| "fast-jwt": "^5.0.5", | ||
| "fast-jwt": "^6.2.0", |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| "fast-jwt": "^6.2.0", | |
| "fast-jwt": "^6.2.4", |
Comment on lines
+6484
to
+6485
| fast-jwt@6.2.0: | ||
| resolution: {integrity: sha512-8HzL09abkCBIaZZSOhDP8re1ozSWa6297so2u46IbeE4zznVEbYX/WrlnZP8K9GCr7gT5uT1uMvOSNZAY86DBQ==} |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| fast-jwt@6.2.0: | |
| resolution: {integrity: sha512-8HzL09abkCBIaZZSOhDP8re1ozSWa6297so2u46IbeE4zznVEbYX/WrlnZP8K9GCr7gT5uT1uMvOSNZAY86DBQ==} | |
| fast-jwt@6.2.4: | |
| resolution: {integrity: sha512-IoQa53wI6TbARU2yelb0L44ggFQnP2qVcwswCSYHbCAWuwpr70icDb3QjG0v01I8Tt01rVGDkN/rRvpk0lKFTA==} |
| fast-json-stable-stringify@2.1.0: {} | ||
|
|
||
| fast-jwt@5.0.6: | ||
| fast-jwt@6.2.0: |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| fast-jwt@6.2.0: | |
| fast-jwt@6.2.4: |
Comment on lines
+411
to
+412
| specifier: ^6.2.0 | ||
| version: 6.2.0 |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| specifier: ^6.2.0 | |
| version: 6.2.0 | |
| specifier: ^6.2.4 | |
| version: 6.2.4 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are a few CVEs for fast-jwt. Bumping to resolved versions here. Let me know if there is any further testing I can perform to help verify. We've been using sst with fast-jwt overridden to this version already.