Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: Remove priority tag from below-the-fold images#121

Open
anyulled wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
bolt/remove-priority-tags-1638016314362912446
Open

⚡ Bolt: Remove priority tag from below-the-fold images#121
anyulled wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
bolt/remove-priority-tags-1638016314362912446

Conversation

@anyulled
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@anyulled anyulled commented Mar 25, 2026

⚡ Bolt: Remove priority tag from below-the-fold images

💡 What

Removed the priority prop from next/image components located in Section 2 and Section 4 of the Home 8 configuration (components/sections/home8/section2.tsx and components/sections/home8/section4.tsx).

🎯 Why

These images are well below the fold. The priority prop forces the browser to preload them eagerly. This competes for crucial network bandwidth with the actual Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) element (the hero image in Section 1). By removing the prop, Next.js natively lazy-loads these images, ensuring that the critical above-the-fold content renders faster.

📊 Impact

Expected to improve LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) and reduce initial page load time by freeing up network bandwidth during the initial critical rendering path.

🔬 Measurement

Load the / route with a throttled network connection (e.g., Fast 3G in Chrome DevTools) and monitor the Network tab. You will observe that the background images for Section 2 and Section 4 are now downloaded later in the waterfall, allowing the hero background image to download and display earlier.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 1638016314362912446 started by @anyulled

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Adjusted image loading optimization for background and decorative images.

Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Mar 25, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
devbcn Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 25, 2026 9:37am

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@qodo-code-review
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ⓘ You are approaching your monthly quota for Qodo. Upgrade your plan

Review Summary by Qodo

Remove priority prop from below-the-fold images

✨ Enhancement

Grey Divider

Walkthroughs

Description
• Remove priority prop from below-the-fold images in Section 2 and Section 4
• Improves LCP by freeing network bandwidth for hero image
• Enables native lazy-loading for non-critical images
• Added explanatory comments documenting the optimization rationale
Diagram
flowchart LR
  A["Section 2 & 4 Images"] -->|"Remove priority prop"| B["Native Lazy Loading"]
  B -->|"Frees bandwidth"| C["Faster Hero Image Load"]
  C -->|"Improves LCP"| D["Better Page Performance"]
Loading

Grey Divider

File Changes

1. components/sections/home8/section2.tsx ✨ Enhancement +2/-1

Remove priority from Section 2 background image

• Removed priority prop from Image component for background texture
• Added explanatory comment about LCP optimization
• Image now uses native lazy-loading instead of eager preloading

components/sections/home8/section2.tsx


2. components/sections/home8/section4.tsx ✨ Enhancement +2/-1

Remove priority from Section 4 layer image

• Removed priority prop from Image component for layer1 element
• Added explanatory comment about LCP optimization
• Image now uses native lazy-loading instead of eager preloading

components/sections/home8/section4.tsx


Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

@qodo-code-review
Copy link
Copy Markdown

qodo-code-review bot commented Mar 25, 2026

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (1) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0) 📐 Spec deviations (0)

Grey Divider


Remediation recommended

1. Fill missing sizes prop 🐞 Bug ➹ Performance
Description
Section2 and Section4 render next/image with fill but without sizes, which makes Next.js
default to 100vw and can lead to unnecessarily large image downloads and runtime/dev warnings.
This undercuts the intended performance optimization by potentially over-fetching these images once
they do load.
Code

components/sections/home8/section2.tsx[17]

+        <Image src="/assets/img/bg/header-bg20.png" alt="Background Texture" fill style={{ objectFit: "cover" }} />
Evidence
In the PR branch, Section2/Section4 have fill images without sizes. Elsewhere in the repo,
fill images consistently specify sizes (e.g., BackgroundCarousel uses sizes="100vw", and
SponsorGroup uses responsive breakpoints), indicating this is an established pattern and avoiding
the default sizing behavior.

components/sections/home8/section2.tsx[13-18]
components/sections/home8/section4.tsx[16-28]
components/BackgroundCarousel.tsx[60-79]
components/sections/home8/SponsorGroup.tsx[1-27]

Agent prompt
The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

### Issue description
`next/image` with `fill` should include a `sizes` prop to inform the browser/Next.js about the rendered image width at different breakpoints. Without it, Next.js assumes `100vw`, which can cause oversized downloads and performance regressions.

### Issue Context
This PR removes `priority` (good for below-the-fold), but the remaining `fill` images in Section2/Section4 still omit `sizes`.

### Fix Focus Areas
- components/sections/home8/section2.tsx[13-18]
- components/sections/home8/section4.tsx[16-28]

### Implementation notes
- For full-bleed/background-like images, `sizes="100vw"` is typically appropriate.
- If the decorative layer/image does *not* actually occupy full viewport width, provide a more accurate responsive `sizes` string to reduce bytes downloaded.

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools


Grey Divider

ⓘ The new review experience is currently in Beta. Learn more

Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request aims to enhance initial page load performance by optimizing how images are loaded on the Home 8 page. By disabling the priority loading for images that appear below the fold, the browser can prioritize the rendering of critical content, leading to a faster Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) and a more responsive user experience.

Highlights

  • Image Loading Optimization: The priority prop has been removed from next/image components in Section 2 and Section 4 of the Home 8 configuration.
  • Performance Improvement: This change prevents eager preloading of below-the-fold images, allowing Next.js to lazy-load them and freeing up network bandwidth for critical above-the-fold content, thereby improving Largest Contentful Paint (LCP).
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 25, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 02f43533-fcfd-425c-a0fb-ab9ca6dbf2e6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b443f1 and b1f3a4f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • components/sections/home8/section2.tsx
  • components/sections/home8/section4.tsx

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request removes the priority prop from Next.js Image components in two files within the home8 section, affecting LCP optimization behavior for background and decorative images.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Image Priority Optimization
components/sections/home8/section2.tsx, components/sections/home8/section4.tsx
Removed priority prop from next/image components rendering background and decorative images, altering Next.js image loading behavior without affecting other props or component structure.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A rabbit hops through image code so clean,
Priority props removed from the scene,
No need to rush when pages load with grace,
Let lazy images find their place,
Optimization blooms along the way! 🖼️

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately and specifically describes the main change: removing the priority prop from below-the-fold images to improve LCP performance.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch bolt/remove-priority-tags-1638016314362912446

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request optimizes page load performance by removing the priority prop from below-the-fold Image components in section2.tsx and section4.tsx, allowing the browser to prioritize the LCP hero image. Additionally, a review comment suggests an accessibility improvement for the Image component in section2.tsx, recommending an empty alt attribute for decorative background images to enhance screen reader experience.

<div className="conference-stats__bg">
<Image src="/assets/img/bg/header-bg20.png" alt="Background Texture" fill style={{ objectFit: "cover" }} priority />
{/* Bolt: Removed priority from below-the-fold image to prioritize LCP hero image */}
<Image src="/assets/img/bg/header-bg20.png" alt="Background Texture" fill style={{ objectFit: "cover" }} />
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For purely decorative images like this background texture, it's a web accessibility best practice to use an empty alt attribute (alt=""). This tells screen readers to ignore the image, preventing them from announcing non-essential information and creating a smoother experience for users with visual impairments. The current alt text "Background Texture" doesn't convey critical information and can be considered noise.

Suggested change
<Image src="/assets/img/bg/header-bg20.png" alt="Background Texture" fill style={{ objectFit: "cover" }} />
<Image src="/assets/img/bg/header-bg20.png" alt="" fill style={{ objectFit: "cover" }} />

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant