-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
Bug/false positive success message vm start #5148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
yadvr
merged 2 commits into
apache:4.15
from
NDBSGMS:bug/false_positive_success_message_vm_start
Jun 27, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would recommend presenting more details to the user/admin. A message that gives some context (where/how) regarding this exception could help the caller to understand what is going on.
For instance:
throw new ResourceUnavailableException(String.format("message containing details of issue for VM %s", vm));OR
throw new ResourceUnavailableException(String.format("message containing details of issue for VM %s due to exception: %s", vm, ex));There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@GabrielBrascher Maybe I'am wrong but I think is a little bit to much info, the vm is not the problem in that case. Also throws the _itMgr.start method a couple exception, so that we can not say here when the vm the problem is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@GabrielBrascher, I tend to agree with @DK101010 but would it make sense to cature the exception in a CloudStackException saying that we are "not retrying as no host is given" ? and would that satisfy your requirements?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@DaanHoogland @DK101010, I agree that my suggestion might be a bit too much info for this context.
As long as we don't throw raw exceptions at the user's face I am good with it 🙂.