Skip to content

Conversation

@shuwenwei
Copy link
Member

Description

Further optimize the efficiency of memtable region scan

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 4, 2026

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
B Maintainability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 4, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 96.96970% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 39.30%. Comparing base (c531044) to head (5a446e2).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...e/dataregion/memtable/AlignedWritableMemChunk.java 97.61% 1 Missing ⚠️
...geengine/dataregion/memtable/WritableMemChunk.java 95.65% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master   #16976   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     39.29%   39.30%           
  Complexity      212      212           
=========================================
  Files          5058     5058           
  Lines        337842   337866   +24     
  Branches      43026    43036   +10     
=========================================
+ Hits         132763   132790   +27     
+ Misses       205079   205076    -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@JackieTien97 JackieTien97 requested a review from Copilot January 4, 2026 08:54
@JackieTien97 JackieTien97 merged commit ebc7d7f into master Jan 4, 2026
34 of 35 checks passed
@JackieTien97 JackieTien97 deleted the optimizeMemTableRegionScan0104 branch January 4, 2026 08:54
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR optimizes the efficiency of memtable region scan operations by refactoring the iteration logic to access underlying array data structures directly, reducing method call overhead and improving cache locality.

Key Changes:

  • Refactored iteration logic in WritableMemChunk and AlignedWritableMemChunk to use batch array access instead of individual element accessors
  • Added getIndices() method to TVList to expose the indices array for optimized access
  • Added comprehensive test cases to verify the optimization works correctly with deletions and sorted data

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
WritableMemChunkRegionScanTest.java Added two new test methods (testAlignedWritableMemChunkRegionScan2 and testNonAlignedWritableMemChunkRegionScan2) that verify region scan behavior with deletions and sorted data
TVList.java Added getIndices() getter method to expose the indices list for optimized batch access
WritableMemChunk.java Refactored getAnySatisfiedTimestamp() to iterate through timestamp, bitmap, and indices arrays directly using nested loops instead of calling accessor methods, improving performance while maintaining correct deletion cursor handling
AlignedWritableMemChunk.java Similar refactoring to use direct array access with nested loops for aligned data, properly handling multi-column null value checks and per-column deletions
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

iotdb-core/datanode/src/main/java/org/apache/iotdb/db/utils/datastructure/TVList.java:760

  public Set<QueryContext> getQueryContextSet() {

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants