Skip to content

UPSTREAM PR #1281: Update ROCm Linux builds#59

Open
loci-dev wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
loci/pr-1281-superm1-linux-artifacts
Open

UPSTREAM PR #1281: Update ROCm Linux builds#59
loci-dev wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
loci/pr-1281-superm1-linux-artifacts

Conversation

@loci-dev
Copy link

Note

Source pull request: leejet/stable-diffusion.cpp#1281

Switch over ROCm builds to artifacts both for stable and preview releases

AMD is in the process of moving over to a brand new build system (TheRock). They have a preview release stream for it, and it includes some significant performance uplifts.

To let people experiment with both stacks generate artifacts both for the stable (7.2) and preview (7.11) stacks.

In both cases - ROCm must be installed first to use this artifact. It's intentionally not bundled because so many ISAs are included and the size of the artifact balloons to an untenable size.


The new artifacts are a much more reasonable ~145MB. And a user won't end up with multiple ROCm stacks on the machine now if they use other software like llama.cpp.

…ases

AMD is in the process of moving over to a brand new build system (TheRock).
They have a preview release stream for it, and it includes some significant
performance uplifts.

To let people experiment with both stacks generate artifacts both for the
stable (7.2) and preview (7.11) stacks.

In both cases - ROCm must be installed first to use this artifact.
It's intentionally not bundled because so many ISAs are included and the
size of the artifact balloons to an untenable size.
@loci-dev loci-dev temporarily deployed to stable-diffusion-cpp-prod February 18, 2026 04:21 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@loci-review
Copy link

loci-review bot commented Feb 18, 2026

No meaningful performance changes were detected across 48303 analyzed functions in the following binaries: build.bin.sd-server, build.bin.sd-cli.

🔎 Full breakdown: Loci Inspector.
💬 Questions? Tag @loci-dev.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments