Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: Replace static chunking with sliding window in ProcessMemoryScanner#101

Open
acebytes wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
bolt/sliding-window-process-scanner-17024677026283096264
Open

⚡ Bolt: Replace static chunking with sliding window in ProcessMemoryScanner#101
acebytes wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
bolt/sliding-window-process-scanner-17024677026283096264

Conversation

@acebytes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@acebytes acebytes commented Apr 8, 2026

💡 What: Refactored scanPIDs in ProcessMemoryScanner.swift to use a continuous sliding window with withTaskGroup instead of static batch chunking.
🎯 Why: Static chunking suffers from tail latency (waiting for the slowest PID scan in a chunk before starting the next batch). A sliding window keeps the concurrency pool continuously saturated up to maxConcurrency, improving overall scanning throughput.
📊 Impact: Maximizes concurrent scanning efficiency; reduces total time taken to scan all PIDs by eliminating wait times between chunks.
🔬 Measurement: To verify, one can measure the total duration of the ProcessMemoryScanner().scan() operation before and after this change, especially under varying system loads.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 17024677026283096264 started by @acebytes

Replaces static task chunking in `scanPIDs` with a continuous sliding window iterator inside `withTaskGroup`. This eliminates tail-latency wait times between chunks, keeping the worker pool fully saturated at `maxConcurrency` and improving overall scanning throughput.

Co-authored-by: acebytes <2820910+acebytes@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant