Skip to content

update Preregistration templates#30

Open
henryy152 wants to merge 46 commits intocrsh:masterfrom
henryy152:master
Open

update Preregistration templates#30
henryy152 wants to merge 46 commits intocrsh:masterfrom
henryy152:master

Conversation

@henryy152
Copy link

I updated the templates so they are more similar to the originals

I updated the template by using the latest version of the orignial template
changed a few things so the r template is closer to the original
Copy link
Owner

@crsh crsh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Henry, thanks, this is great. The added detail in the description of the items will be very helpful, especially the examples. I have added some comments and requested a few changes. Would you be willing to revise your PR?

Also, before we merge your changes, you may consider adding yourself as a contributor to the DESCRIPTION file.

-I have implemented the comments
-Required → *
-Errors fixed
vantveer prereg
-Comments implemented
-Required → *
update to the latest as predicted_prereg version
Some formatting changes to ensure consistency with the other templates
I changed <-- to <!--
I forgot to add a few exclamation marks in the code
new template suggestion
added the latest version of the prp quant template
@henryy152
Copy link
Author

This pull request implements the requested comments and fixes remaining errors.
Required fields were updated to use *, and formatting was adjusted to ensure consistency across the templates. The existing as_predicted_prereg template was updated to the latest version,
the DESCRIPTION file was updated
In addition, several new preregistration templates were added (e.g. qualitative studies, secondary data analysis, EEG/ERP, scoping reviews, multiverse analyses, experience sampling, and PRP-QUANT v3)

Copy link
Owner

@crsh crsh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this. I have added some more comments.

For the newly added templates (e.g., QRP-QUANT), please make sure that the folder structure is analogous to those of the other templates. Specifically:

  • Each template needs to go into a subfolder of inst/rmarkdown/templates, these should be in all lower case and adhere to the conventions of previous templates. For example for the EEG-template: `eeg_erp_prereg``
  • The template files themselves should be names skeleton.Rmd

…Reviews to inst/rmarkdown/templates/scoping_reviews_prereg/skeleton/skeleton.Rmd
…s to inst/rmarkdown/templates/multi_analyses_prereg/skeleton/skeleton.Rmd
…lysis: A template to inst/rmarkdown/templates/secondary_data_analysis_prereg/skeleton/skeleton.Rmd
… to inst/rmarkdown/templates/qualitative_study_prereg/skeleton/skeleton.Rmd
removed chunk and formatting changes
chunk removed # formatting changes
implemented commets
implemented the comments
implemented comments
implemented comments
implemented comments(not all of them yet)
@henryy152
Copy link
Author

I implemented most of the suggestions. I still need to change the numbering to level-3 headings in the exp_sampling_prereg template. In addition, I will double-check that the formatting is consistent across all templates.

formatting changes
Enter your response here was missing
deleted: ## Working Title

Enter your response here.

because the title is supposed to be on the front page
I am not sure what this part does there so I deleted it
formatting changes
@crsh
Copy link
Owner

crsh commented Mar 10, 2026

Great, thanks. @LisaSpitzer would be willing to review the implementation of the PRP-QUANT before I merge this?

Copy link
Owner

@crsh crsh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Henry, there is a bit of formatting of the Markdown left to do, but I think it will be quicker if I do this myself.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants