Draft
Conversation
Member
Author
|
This has a lot of overlap with #520 |
Member
Author
|
It would be good to restart this and get it published. It currently write references to Kerchunk format, but is this what you would recommend @TomNicholas, or is Icechunk a better default choice now? |
Member
|
I recommend Icechunk now, for all these reasons: zarr-developers/VirtualiZarr#818 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the example I was working on at the Post-AGU Pangeo Hack Day on Saturday.
The idea is to take multiple NetCDF files, combine with VirtualiZarr, and then rechunk using Cubed. This works, although there are some rough edges still. Also, when I tried using Icechunk rather than Kerchunk to write the references, I got an error when reading them back, so that needs investigating too.