Skip to content

Conversation

@Lalayqz
Copy link

@Lalayqz Lalayqz commented Jan 15, 2025

Required (check [ ] -> [x] all that apply):

  • There is a relevant & reviewed issue in the tracker (please link it below) The "no" rule not expanded when used with a tag which is also a rule prefix #145
  • I've followed all instructions that were given in the issue comments (if not, please specify below)
  • This PR only resolves a single issue. (Please split up bigger PRs into multiple requests where needed.)
  • To the best of my ability I've followed good commit hygiene, avoided fixing too many things per commit, provided good commit messages, and did basic cleaning on the commit history if needed.
  • I am willing and able to release this contribution under the MIT license (if not, please explain below)
  • I have described this PR, highlighting important files, additional changes, and what you expect would be most important to review.
  • If relevant, provide example projects and tests for the unit tester

Copy link

@RobLoach RobLoach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This makes sense to me. If Puzzlescriptnext maintained still? looks like there have been some updates to upstream puzzlescript recently

@david-pfx
Copy link
Owner

This was fixed and deployed in v-25b14. It's in the README. I'll close the PR. Thanks for your effort.

Yes PSNext is maintained. Find a bug and I'll fix it. However I'm taking a break from working on enhancements, since I don't seem to be welcome on thinky and no-one seems very intererested.

@david-pfx david-pfx closed this Jan 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants